So what is this toxic masculinity thing anyhow?

[Sparko]

IF someone who was attracted to children was at risk of acting on it, then they would be categorized as a potential danger to the community and probably mentally ill. Where did I say otherwise?

What person who desires to have sex with children would not be at risk of acting on it?

[Cow Poke]

What person who desires to have sex with children would not be at risk of acting on it?

Yeah, that kinda had me wondering, as well. Maybe one locked away in a mental ward or prison?

[Sparko]

Yeah, that kinda had me wondering, as well. Maybe one locked away in a mental ward or prison?

So they are prevented from having the deviant sex they desire because they are deemed insane, but since they can't act on their desires, they are not insane. Yep, that sounds about like what Tassman would say.

[Cow Poke]

So they are prevented from having the deviant sex they desire because they are deemed insane, but since they can't act on their desires, they are not insane. Yep, that sounds about like what Tassman would say.

I think Jimmy loaned Tassman his liberaltalkingpointsfordummies.

[Tassman]

What person who desires to have sex with children would not be at risk of acting on it?

[Sparko]

No more than anyone desiring to have sex with beautiful women would be at risk of acting upon it. Most of us can control our sexual urges, whatever they are. Even the disproportionally high number of Evangelicals that watch internet porn usually don’t act upon their illicit desires.

So you are saying that heterosexual males are not at risk of having sex with women, ever? And if they did they would be mentally ill?

Tassman, you should just stop right now while you have both feet in your mouth.

[One Bad Pig]

I think Jimmy loaned Tassman his liberaltalkingpointsfordummies.

...and Tassman smoked it.

[Tassman]

So you are saying that heterosexual males are not at risk of having sex with women, ever? And if they did they would be mentally ill?

[Sparko]

That’s not what I’m saying.

sure looks like it to me. Your arguments are getting worse. Heterosexual sex is not abnormal to begin with so your analogy is flawed from the getgo.

[Sparko]

sure looks like it to me. Your arguments are getting worse. Heterosexual sex is not abnormal to begin with so your analogy is flawed from the getgo.

[Cow Poke]

sure looks like it to me. Your arguments are getting worse.

UNpossible!

[JimL]

sure looks like it to me. Your arguments are getting worse.

That's because you have reading comprehension problems, Sparko. I've noticed that before in you. I suggest you go back and re-read what Tass wrote and try to focus.

[Sparko]

That's because you have reading comprehension problems, Sparko. I've noticed that before in you. I suggest you go back and re-read what Tass wrote and try to focus.

OK. I did. He was implying exactly what I said. Now what?

[Tassman]

sure looks like it to me.

I guess it would, to a moron.

Your arguments are getting worse. Heterosexual sex is not abnormal to begin with so your analogy is flawed from the getgo.

ANY sexual urges which cannot be kept under control and risk resulting in non-consensual sex, can be classified as a mental illness requiring therapy…or jail if they’re acted upon.

[JimL]

OK. I did. He was implying exactly what I said. Now what?

Now what? You just proved again that you have reading comprehension problems. Try again.