Another nail in the traitors coffin.

[Sparko]

Well he has done far more than just deny interference, but for a president to use his platform to undermine U.S intel and deny interference when he knows with absolute certainty that there was interference, is obstruction. But, then you have to ask yourself, why is he doing it?

[One Bad Pig]

Well, since your not paying attention, I guess you'll have it up if you're interested. Not!

No, just using my head. You should try it OBP, anyone can do it.

No, only when you take into account all the other obvious actions of Trumps treasonous ways. But you'll come around eventually.

Keep yelling, Jim.

For the sarcastically impaired the following is said in jest

Surely that'll convince someone eventually, right?

[Mountain Man]

Keep yelling, Jim.

For the sarcastically impaired the following is said in jest

Surely that'll convince someone eventually, right?

Like the old joke about a speech writer who added the following margin note:

"This point is weak; be sure to yell."

[seer]

Tin-Foil-Hat-for-Humans-by-Archie-McPhee.jpg

[JimL]

Keep yelling, Jim.

For the sarcastically impaired the following is said in jest

Surely that'll convince someone eventually, right?

I have no intention of convincing you lot of anything, I know you all to well. You're all similar to your hero, you can put the evidence right in front of his face and he'll still deny it.

[One Bad Pig]

I have no intention of convincing you lot of anything, I know you all to well. You're all similar to your hero, you can put the evidence right in front of his face and he'll still deny it.

CEPG0BtWoAAlovd.jpg

[Sparko]

I have no intention of convincing you lot of anything, I know you all to well. You're all similar to your hero, you can put the evidence right in front of his face and he'll still deny it.

You should try actually presenting some evidence and see.

[Mountain Man]

I have no intention of convincing you lot of anything, I know you all to well. You're all similar to your hero, you can put the evidence right in front of his face and he'll still deny it.

Like I told Chuck the other day, if you had compelling evidence to support your claims then you would post it, with source, without hesitation, and then you would crow mightily if we refused to accept it. So if you're in possession of such evidence, why haven't you shoved it in our faces already?

[JimL]

You should try actually presenting some evidence and see.

I've done so quite often, but your biased brains don't allow you to see it.

[Cow Poke]

I've done so quite often...

No. No, you don't. You regurgitate your "liberal talking points for idiots", with rarely ever a source provided.

[JimL]

Like I told Chuck the other day, if you had compelling evidence to support your claims then you would post it, with source, without hesitation, and then you would crow mightily if we refused to accept it. So if you're in possession of such evidence, why haven't you shoved it in our faces already?

I have you dope, and so have many others. You're to brainwashed, MM, nothing is ever going to change what you already believe.

[lilpixieofterror]

Well he has done far more than just deny interference, but for a president to use his platform to undermine U.S intel and deny interference when he knows with absolute certainty that there was interference, is obstruction. But, then you have to ask yourself, why is he doing it?

[JimL]

For one thing dummy, its Trumps intel, and for another, stop helping Trump to undermine our democratic institutions with your idiocy.

[lilpixieofterror]

For one thing dummy, its Trumps intel, and for another, stop helping Trump to undermine our democratic institutions with your idiocy.

[Tassman]

For one thing dummy, its Trumps intel, and for another, stop helping Trump to undermine our democratic institutions with your idiocy.

We have Trump's version of events and we have the Intel version of events. Why would ANYONE believe the former given his history of compulsive lying on a daily basis.