Rush Limbaugh: Hurricanes are a liberal conspiracy for promoting climate change

[Starlight]

I'm wondering what adiabatic theory has to do with YEC.

Both are examples of nuttery, both are being promoted by forum nut MM who has a history of nuttery.

[Starlight]

So, to defend your use of ad hominem, you double down with more. Sweet.

You seem to have graduated lately from your old stance of arguing substance but always being wrong about everything to a new one of just trolling by providing unhelpful and irrelevant 1 liners. I can't say it's an improvement.

[Mountain Man]

Both are examples of nuttery, both are being promoted by forum nut MM who has a history of nuttery.

Coming from you, that's a compliment.

[EvoUK]

I'm wondering what adiabatic theory has to do with YEC.

Because he questions the science regarding climate change, then in the next sentence questions an old earth, calling into question his ability to understand said science.

You cannot be a YEC and then assume your opinion or beliefs on other sciences to be taken seriously.

[Starlight]

Because he questions the science regarding climate change, then in the next sentence questions an old earth, calling into question his ability to understand said science.

You cannot be a YEC and then assume your opinion or beliefs on other sciences to be taken seriously.

But MM is a scientific expert because he once read a Breitbarf article. I'd totally trust his random conspiracy theories above the opinions of the 3 posters with science PhDs posting in this thread, I mean, they're probably part of the conspiracy to cover up the flat and young earth. I mean, science was once wrong about something or other.

[Mountain Man]

Because he questions the science regarding climate change, then in the next sentence questions an old earth, calling into question his ability to understand said science.

You cannot be a YEC and then assume your opinion or beliefs on other sciences to be taken seriously.

This is just more of the "You referenced facts and theories that contradict my preferred point of view!" crybaby routine. Anybody who claims that a scientific question is closed for debate is someone who has little if any respect for science. So now the question has to be asked: Should anybody here take your opinions seriously?

[One Bad Pig]

You seem to have graduated lately from your old stance of arguing substance but always being wrong about everything to a new one of just trolling by providing unhelpful and irrelevant 1 liners. I can't say it's an improvement.

Don't like being called out? Change.

[One Bad Pig]

I'm wondering what adiabatic theory has to do with YEC.

Because he questions the science regarding climate change, then in the next sentence questions an old earth, calling into question his ability to understand said science.

You cannot be a YEC and then assume your opinion or beliefs on other sciences to be taken seriously.

Oh, so nothing. Thanks for clearing that up.

[One Bad Pig]

But MM is a scientific expert because he once read a Breitbarf article. I'd totally trust his random conspiracy theories above the opinions of the 3 posters with science PhDs posting in this thread, I mean, they're probably part of the conspiracy to cover up the flat and young earth. I mean, science was once wrong about something or other.

Would you mind pointing out where MM calls himself a scientific expert?

[Starlight]

Don't like being called out? Change.

Follow your own advice.

[One Bad Pig]

Follow your own advice.

I'm not complaining.

[lilpixieofterror]

Both are examples of nuttery, both are being promoted by forum nut MM who has a history of nuttery.

It's kinda amusing that the same person that says you can pay up to 50% of your pay to taxes and suffer zero from it or wants it legal to execute newborns wants to accuse others of being crazy. While I believe YEC is wrong, at least YECs don't support killing kids or support population decline to 'prevent global warming.' I think I will take YEC craziness any day over that kind of stuff.

[lilpixieofterror]

Because he questions the science regarding climate change, then in the next sentence questions an old earth, calling into question his ability to understand said science.

You cannot be a YEC and then assume your opinion or beliefs on other sciences to be taken seriously.

Sounds like a rather lazy approach to me, so you can dismiss the arguments without having to debate them.

[Tassman]

Source: "Aliens Cause Global Warming" by Michael Crichton

². Nobody says the consensus is that the sun is 93 million miles away. It would never occur to anyone to speak that way.

http://stephenschneider.stanford.edu/Publications/PDF_Papers/Crichton2003.pdf"

© Copyright Original Source

https://skepticalscience.com/Crichto...l_Warming.html

[rogue06]

Because he questions the science regarding climate change, then in the next sentence questions an old earth, calling into question his ability to understand said science.

You cannot be a YEC and then assume your opinion or beliefs on other sciences to be taken seriously.

Raymond Damadian?