Deported 20 times, illegal comes back to rape old woman

[demi-conservative]

A man accused of breaking into a 65-year-old woman's home, sexually assaulting her and stealing her car was arrested after allegedly assaulting another woman and running from police.

Sergio Jose Martinez, 31, was caught July 24 after officers chased him through a neighborhood.

According to court documents filed in March 2017, Martinez has a history of illegal entry into the United States. He has been a transient in the Portland area for more than a year and has been deported 20 times.

http://www.kgw.com/mb/news/woman-65-...lary/459231264

And libtards still don't want yuuuuuge wall. Because they're actually fine with this

[KingsGambit]

Because they're actually fine with this

Philosophy nerds, help, which logical fallacy is this?

[Starlight]

Philosophy Psychology nerds, help, which logical fallacy mental disorder is this?

Psychosis.

[Darth Executor]

Philosophy nerds, help, which logical fallacy is this?

It's not a fallacy at all, progressives protect foreign criminals, including (or rather, especially) rapists as a matter of routine.

[seer]

Philosophy nerds, help, which logical fallacy is this?

No fallacy, this is a direct result of leftist policies.

[Charles]

No fallacy, this is a direct result of leftist policies.

Even if it is a direct result of leftist policies, then how does it follow that "they're actually fine with this"?

I guess we have all tried to make decisions, see the consequences and then go: "I'm not fine with this at all"? Does the consequence of that have to be that you go for a rather extreme solution in the other direction? I mean the sentence "And libtards still don't want yuuuuuge wall." could make it seem as if that wall was the only possible solution to the problem.

Wouldn't it be fair to consider whether the wall would have consequences in itself even if it did solve some problems? And is it not a fact that in politics many decisions have consequences you don't like at all, but that does not mean you find the alternative better?

[Tassman]

Philosophy nerds, help, which logical fallacy is this?

A non sequitur (Latin for "it does not follow"), which in formal logic, is an invalid argument.

[Mountain Man]

Even if it is a direct result of leftist policies, then how does it follow that "they're actually fine with this"?

Because they ignore obvious solutions like improving border security and clamping down on immigration and instead implement insane policies like "catch and release" and sanctuary cities where criminals like this are allowed to seek refuge. The fact that there isn't a loud outcry from liberal voters demanding that their elected officials exercise some common sense logically leads one to the conclusion that "they're actually fine with this".

Frankly, I find your "Oops... who could have predicted that consequence?" attitude unconscionable.

[rogue06]

Even if it is a direct result of leftist policies, then how does it follow that "they're actually fine with this"?

Perhaps the fact that they continue with and vigorously defend the policies that repeatedly have led to things like this?

[Terraceth]

Is there evidence that abandoning of "leftist policies" would have caused this particular event to not occur?

After all, when there's a shooting and liberals talk about how it shows there should be more gun control, the conservative argument is frequently to say that harsher gun control wouldn't have actually stopped it (as such guns are frequently procured illegally or would have been gotten even under harsher control). So by the same token, what "leftist policies" being changed would have definitely stopped this?

[rogue06]

Is there evidence that abandoning of "leftist policies" would have caused this particular event to not occur?

In this case he would have been in jail rather than released to prowl the streets for victims, so the answer would be "yes"

[Darth Executor]

Is there evidence that abandoning of "leftist policies" would have caused this particular event to not occur?

Yes, there would be an army at the border and this guy wouldn't have crossed it once, let alone 20 times.

[Terraceth]

In this case he would have been in jail rather than released to prowl the streets for victims, so the answer would be "yes"

Okay.