Bingo. AI might be able to create a new image, or song, or poem that mimics and combines and iterates different styles and techniques, but there's no intent behind it. No matter how complex AI becomes, it will only ever be a non-feeling machine crunching numbers. Self-awareness is a gift exclusive to those who were created in God's image.
Announcement
Collapse
Civics 101 Guidelines
Want to argue about politics? Healthcare reform? Taxes? Governments? You've come to the right place!
Try to keep it civil though. The rules still apply here.
Try to keep it civil though. The rules still apply here.
See more
See less
Who Needs Picasso?
Collapse
X
-
Then we have this:
Michael Jackson's chimp Bubbles is now an artist and he's about to have an exhibition - with paintings on sale for up to $2,000
http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/arti...es-artist.htmlAtheism is the cult of death, the death of hope. The universe is doomed, you are doomed, the only thing that remains is to await your execution...
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Jbnueb2OI4o&t=3s
Comment
-
Originally posted by Mountain Man View PostThey've been doing a lot of this kind of stuff recently, such as having AI compose music, or write movie scripts, or even edit movie trailers, but I still say that these derivative, homogenized works that are "applauded" by critics don't so much speak to how smart AI has become but to how dumb the average population has become.
Comment
-
Yes, I would know, because I encounter liberals on a daily basis.
As for AI, the idea that it will ever surpass humans (whatever that means) is based on the false premise that we're nothing more than organic computers programmed by evolution rather than beings created in the image of God.Some may call me foolish, and some may call me odd
But I'd rather be a fool in the eyes of man
Than a fool in the eyes of God
From "Fools Gold" by Petra
Comment
-
For the sake of argument, suppose AI does "surpass" humanity? What should be its moral obligation towards us? Should it treat us as equals, or should it treat us as an expendable resource, similar to how we treat the lesser animals like cows and horses?
To put it another way, would you prefer the AI to have a Christian worldview, or an atheistic one?Some may call me foolish, and some may call me odd
But I'd rather be a fool in the eyes of man
Than a fool in the eyes of God
From "Fools Gold" by Petra
Comment
-
wait. OK I understand robots wanting to take our jobs, but now they want to take our fun and art too? Are they going to start doing our drugs too? drinking our beer?
feature_drinkingrobot.jpg
Those robots are just too greedy.
They better stay away from my bacon.
Comment
-
It's been demonstrated time and time again that people, even scientists, are really bad at predicting technological advances just a few years in the future, let alone decades in the future.
Especially because the leading causes of technological advancement has always been practical application. A Smart Phone, for example, has a practical application: It makes doing a whole lot of things easier. There is, as far as I can tell, not any practical application for robots that can "have fun" or "fall in love" with each other. There is the incentive of doing it just to prove it could be done, but this has two issues: First, it's harder to get funding for that, and second, even if it is accomplished, you've done it; there's little incentive to, after making one such robot, to make a lot more (maybe a few more to see how they interact, but not mass produce). As shown by the fact no one has walked on the moon since 1972, novelty-based technological advancement gets its plug pulled once the novelty wears off.Last edited by Terraceth; 07-06-2017, 07:58 PM.
Comment
-
Originally posted by Mountain Man View Post
As for AI, the idea that it will ever surpass humans (whatever that means) is based on the false premise that we're nothing more than organic computers programmed by evolution rather than beings created in the image of God.
Originally posted by Mountain Man View PostFor the sake of argument, suppose AI does "surpass" humanity? What should be its moral obligation towards us? Should it treat us as equals, or should it treat us as an expendable resource, similar to how we treat the lesser animals like cows and horses?
To put it another way, would you prefer the AI to have a Christian worldview, or an atheistic one?Last edited by Tassman; 07-07-2017, 12:13 AM.
Comment
-
Originally posted by Terraceth View PostIt's been demonstrated time and time again that people, even scientists, are really bad at predicting technological advances just a few years in the future, let alone decades in the future.
Especially because the leading causes of technological advancement has always been practical application. A Smart Phone, for example, has a practical application: It makes doing a whole lot of things easier. There is, as far as I can tell, not any practical application for robots that can "have fun" or "fall in love" with each other. There is the incentive of doing it just to prove it could be done, but this has two issues: First, it's harder to get funding for that, and second, even if it is accomplished, you've done it; there's little incentive to, after making one such robot, to make a lot more (maybe a few more to see how they interact, but not mass produce). As shown by the fact no one has walked on the moon since 1972, novelty-based technological advancement gets its plug pulled once the novelty wears off.
Comment
-
Originally posted by Tassman View PostAnd, yes humans are "organic computers programmed by evolution".Atheism is the cult of death, the death of hope. The universe is doomed, you are doomed, the only thing that remains is to await your execution...
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Jbnueb2OI4o&t=3s
Comment
-
Originally posted by Tassmoron View PostThere is no substantive evidence that humans are "beings created in the image of God".
You know how I know you're an idiot? Because you say ignorant things like that.
Originally posted by Tassmoron View PostAnd, yes humans are "organic computers programmed by evolution".
It's possible that AI beings will treat us the same way that Christians treated the natives during the era of colonial expansion, i.e. badly. But, hopefully not.
Of course AI will never get to that point, so this is all hypothetical anyway.Some may call me foolish, and some may call me odd
But I'd rather be a fool in the eyes of man
Than a fool in the eyes of God
From "Fools Gold" by Petra
Comment
-
Originally posted by seer View PostSo our rationality is programmed by non-rational forces, that is about as plausible as a tornado blowing through a dump and creating a working calculator, or blowing through a thousand dumps and creating a single working calculator.Some may call me foolish, and some may call me odd
But I'd rather be a fool in the eyes of man
Than a fool in the eyes of God
From "Fools Gold" by Petra
Comment
Related Threads
Collapse
Topics | Statistics | Last Post | ||
---|---|---|---|---|
Started by seanD, Today, 04:10 AM
|
9 responses
43 views
0 likes
|
Last Post
by Sparko
Today, 09:10 AM
|
||
Started by Cow Poke, Yesterday, 04:44 AM
|
13 responses
82 views
0 likes
|
Last Post
by Cow Poke
Today, 05:15 AM
|
||
Started by Ronson, 04-30-2024, 03:40 PM
|
10 responses
70 views
0 likes
|
Last Post
by Roy
Today, 04:58 AM
|
||
Started by Sparko, 04-30-2024, 09:33 AM
|
16 responses
81 views
0 likes
|
Last Post
by rogue06
Yesterday, 12:27 PM
|
||
Started by Hypatia_Alexandria, 04-30-2024, 09:11 AM
|
60 responses
308 views
0 likes
|
Last Post
by Mountain Man
Today, 10:31 AM
|
Comment