Announcement

Collapse

Civics 101 Guidelines

Want to argue about politics? Healthcare reform? Taxes? Governments? You've come to the right place!

Try to keep it civil though. The rules still apply here.
See more
See less

U.S. in 'beginning stages' of talks on Jerusalem embassy move

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • U.S. in 'beginning stages' of talks on Jerusalem embassy move

    U.S. in 'beginning stages' of talks on Jerusalem embassy move

    By Warren Strobel and Matt Spetalnick

    WASHINGTON (Reuters) - The White House said on Sunday that it is only in the early stages of talks to fulfill President Donald Trump's pledge to move the U.S. embassy in Israel from Tel Aviv to Jerusalem, an action that would likely spark anger in the Arab world.

    "We are at the very beginning stages of even discussing this subject," White House spokesman Sean Spicer said in a statement. Aides said no announcement of an embassy move was imminent.

    Washington's embassy is in Tel Aviv, as are most foreign diplomatic posts. Israel calls Jerusalem its eternal capital, but Palestinians also lay claim to the city as part of an eventual Palestinian state. Both sides cite biblical, historical and political claims.

    Trump, who vowed during the 2016 presidential campaign to move the embassy, was due to speak by phone on Sunday with Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu, their first call since the U.S. businessman-turned-politician took office on Friday.

    Any decision to break with the status quo is likely to prompt protests from U.S. allies in the Middle East such as Saudi Arabia, Jordan and Egypt. Washington relies on those countries for help in fighting the Islamic State militant group, which the new U.S. president has said is a priority.

    The U.S. Congress passed a law in 1995 describing Jerusalem as capital of Israel and saying it should not be divided, but successive Republican and Democratic presidents have used their foreign policy powers to maintain the U.S. Embassy in Tel Aviv and to back negotiations between Israel and the Palestinians on the status of Jerusalem.


    This could prove to be very interesting.
    The first to state his case seems right until another comes and cross-examines him.

  • #2
    Cool, gratuitously incite anger across the Arab world for no useful reason. What a wonderful policy move.
    "I hate him passionately", he's "a demonic force" - Tucker Carlson, in private, on Donald Trump
    "Every line of serious work that I have written since 1936 has been written, directly or indirectly, against totalitarianism and for democratic socialism" - George Orwell
    "[Capitalism] as it exists today is, in my opinion, the real source of evils. I am convinced there is only one way to eliminate these grave evils, namely through the establishment of a socialist economy" - Albert Einstein

    Comment


    • #3
      Originally posted by Starlight View Post
      Cool, gratuitously incite anger across the Arab world for no useful reason. What a wonderful policy move.
      Since when did the Arab world need a reason to be angry?
      The first to state his case seems right until another comes and cross-examines him.

      Comment


      • #4
        Originally posted by Cow Poke View Post
        Since when did the Arab world need a reason to be angry?
        Since when did the US need a reason to make foreign policy blunders?
        "I hate him passionately", he's "a demonic force" - Tucker Carlson, in private, on Donald Trump
        "Every line of serious work that I have written since 1936 has been written, directly or indirectly, against totalitarianism and for democratic socialism" - George Orwell
        "[Capitalism] as it exists today is, in my opinion, the real source of evils. I am convinced there is only one way to eliminate these grave evils, namely through the establishment of a socialist economy" - Albert Einstein

        Comment


        • #5
          Originally posted by Starlight View Post
          Since when did the US need a reason to make foreign policy blunders?
          Since when did Starlight need a reason to criticize the US?
          The first to state his case seems right until another comes and cross-examines him.

          Comment


          • #6
            Originally posted by Cow Poke View Post
            Since when did Starlight need a reason to criticize the US?
            When I criticize the US I always have a reason. The US seems to keep providing an endless source of them.
            "I hate him passionately", he's "a demonic force" - Tucker Carlson, in private, on Donald Trump
            "Every line of serious work that I have written since 1936 has been written, directly or indirectly, against totalitarianism and for democratic socialism" - George Orwell
            "[Capitalism] as it exists today is, in my opinion, the real source of evils. I am convinced there is only one way to eliminate these grave evils, namely through the establishment of a socialist economy" - Albert Einstein

            Comment


            • #7
              Originally posted by Starlight View Post
              When I criticize the US I always have a reason. The US seems to keep providing an endless source of them.
              Don't quit your day job. (You do have one, yes?)
              The first to state his case seems right until another comes and cross-examines him.

              Comment


              • #8
                Originally posted by Cow Poke View Post
                Since when did Starlight need a reason to criticize the US?
                He has to strain himself not to.

                I'm always still in trouble again

                "You're by far the worst poster on TWeb" and "TWeb's biggest liar" --starlight (the guy who says Stalin was a right-winger)
                "Overall I would rate the withdrawal from Afghanistan as by far the best thing Biden's done" --Starlight
                "Of course, human life begins at fertilization that’s not the argument." --Tassman

                Comment


                • #9
                  Given the obvious foreign policy risks here, what is the affirmative purpose of doing this?
                  "I am not angered that the Moral Majority boys campaign against abortion. I am angry when the same men who say, "Save OUR children" bellow "Build more and bigger bombers." That's right! Blast the children in other nations into eternity, or limbless misery as they lay crippled from "OUR" bombers! This does not jell." - Leonard Ravenhill

                  Comment


                  • #10
                    Originally posted by KingsGambit View Post
                    Given the obvious foreign policy risks here, what is the affirmative purpose of doing this?
                    The only one I can think of is sending a clear message to Israel that we are on their side.
                    The first to state his case seems right until another comes and cross-examines him.

                    Comment


                    • #11
                      Originally posted by Cow Poke View Post
                      The only one I can think of is sending a clear message to Israel that we are on their side.
                      That doesn't sound worth it for something intangible given the possibility of very tangible harms.
                      "I am not angered that the Moral Majority boys campaign against abortion. I am angry when the same men who say, "Save OUR children" bellow "Build more and bigger bombers." That's right! Blast the children in other nations into eternity, or limbless misery as they lay crippled from "OUR" bombers! This does not jell." - Leonard Ravenhill

                      Comment


                      • #12
                        Originally posted by KingsGambit View Post
                        That doesn't sound worth it for something intangible given the possibility of very tangible harms.
                        You won't get any argument from me on that.
                        The first to state his case seems right until another comes and cross-examines him.

                        Comment


                        • #13
                          Originally posted by Cow Poke View Post
                          The only one I can think of is sending a clear message to Israel that we are on their side.
                          Did Obama's 38 billion dollars not do the job?
                          "I hate him passionately", he's "a demonic force" - Tucker Carlson, in private, on Donald Trump
                          "Every line of serious work that I have written since 1936 has been written, directly or indirectly, against totalitarianism and for democratic socialism" - George Orwell
                          "[Capitalism] as it exists today is, in my opinion, the real source of evils. I am convinced there is only one way to eliminate these grave evils, namely through the establishment of a socialist economy" - Albert Einstein

                          Comment


                          • #14
                            Originally posted by Starlight View Post
                            Did Obama's 38 billion dollars not do the job?
                            Obama sent his own money?
                            The first to state his case seems right until another comes and cross-examines him.

                            Comment


                            • #15
                              While I occasionally criticize the over zealous actions of Israel, and some of its actions, I still think we should be their allies. However, even in the light of that, I fail to see why this move is good enough to warrant it. It would only mean support of a nation already allied with the US and the west, at the cost of further inflammation of the other relations.

                              It looks cool, but I don't think it is wise.

                              Comment

                              Related Threads

                              Collapse

                              Topics Statistics Last Post
                              Started by CivilDiscourse, Today, 09:49 AM
                              3 responses
                              39 views
                              0 likes
                              Last Post NorrinRadd  
                              Started by CivilDiscourse, Today, 05:48 AM
                              8 responses
                              54 views
                              0 likes
                              Last Post Terraceth  
                              Started by seer, Yesterday, 04:12 PM
                              57 responses
                              247 views
                              0 likes
                              Last Post CivilDiscourse  
                              Started by Sparko, 06-11-2024, 10:36 AM
                              161 responses
                              760 views
                              0 likes
                              Last Post Mountain Man  
                              Started by seer, 06-11-2024, 09:09 AM
                              17 responses
                              124 views
                              0 likes
                              Last Post Starlight  
                              Working...
                              X