Was it a version of The Imp of the Perverse?

[CivilDiscourse]

Your comments here strike me as mildly paranoid


It is not dishonest it simply highlights your poor syntax and generalised thinking

That is not quite the same thing

Note the qualification.

Given your various comments about me [some of which have been edited] you demonstrate a rather petty and spiteful personality. However, that is just my opinion!

Oh its dishonest. But given how you double down on your (probably) deliberate misreading, I have no interest in watching you make up temporary rules for language you don't believe in.

You have avoided talking about following the precedent of democrats by trying to shift discussion to me, or your standard misreading game.

I won't follow "that flowery path"

[rogue06]

Of course Schiff is "a snake", he's a Democrat and liberal [or at least what passes for a liberal in the USA]. Everything you detest.

Yeah. Nothing whatsoever to do with his conduct.

[Hypatia_Alexandria]

Oh its dishonest.

No it isn't.

But given how you double down on your (probably) deliberate misreading, I have no interest in watching you make up temporary rules for language you don't believe in.

I can only respond to what you write.

You have avoided talking about following the precedent of democrats by trying to shift discussion to me, or your standard misreading game.

I won't follow "that flowery path"

If you do not wish to elaborate on your initial remark, I can only respond to that initial remark.

However, if you feel you have nothing further to add to this thread, you know what you can do.

[CivilDiscourse]

No it isn't.

I can only respond to what you write.

If you do not wish to elaborate on your initial remark, I can only respond to that initial remark.

However, if you feel you have nothing further to add to this thread, you know what you can do.

Who said I had nothing to add to the thread, just that I wouldn't play your games where you deliberately misread posts, then watch you double down that you are the only one who can correctly interpret it and anyone else who disagrees with you obviously can't read.


You can choose to actually address what I've written, or you can shift the topic, so far you've chosen the latter.

[Gondwanaland]

Your comments here strike me as mildly paranoid

You keep using that word. I do not think it means what you think it means.

[Gondwanaland]

I can only respond to what you write.

When it's convenient to you. Any other time you're more than happy to declare what people are thinking and their motivations, despite them not writing anything about either.

That's why you're known as Hypocrite_Allthetime, among other monikers.