As has been noted many times by now, it seems nothing is going to stop the Trump apologists (many probably schooled in apologetics from an early stage in their lives) to continue down the line of always finding ways to support what is evidently wrong and/or false. Micheal Gerson put some interesting words on it:
Trump himself said he could stand in the middle of Fifth Avenue and shoot somebody and he wouldn't lose any voters as a consequence. Having spent some years on tweb I know exactly how that would work out. The trump apologists would find sources, telling us it was more complicated, Trump's life was probably at danger, it was self defence, unfortunately he had to do it to save his own life. Even if he himself would say he did it for the fun of it, we would be taught that Trump should be evaluated based on his actions not on his words. Someone should stop his tweets and apart from that everything shoul just continue. I mean, we have seen it over and over.
Perhaps one should be surprised that his followers are willing to accept even bigger lies when he is confronting them in the role of the loser. But it seems the very idea of Trump losing is one they simply cannot accept. And, the seemingly everlasting source of lies (ironically trusted by many people who claim to believe the truth should set us free) is willing to feed them with new ones. And bigger ones if needed. Unfortunately, we are not seeing the end of it yet. Fortunately, they have lost influence to the degree they used to have.
This is the litmus test of lunacy. The affirmation of demonstrably false statements has long been one of President Trump’s loyalty tests. His followers must agree that his inaugural crowd was larger than Barack Obama’s. Or that the Ukraine call was “perfect.” Or that hydroxychloroquine was a “game changer.”
But this instance is far more ambitious. The allegation of widespread and concerted electoral fraud is groundbreaking in its absurdity — more like contending that Obama’s entire inaugural crowd was computer-generated imagery, or that Ukraine is actually a fictional country, or that hydroxychloroquine is the long-sought elixir of eternal life. Trump is no longer asking his followers to believe the implausible. He is insisting that they accept a story as incredible as Pizzagate or the CIA assassination of John F. Kennedy. https://www.washingtonpost.com/opini...7e8_story.html
But this instance is far more ambitious. The allegation of widespread and concerted electoral fraud is groundbreaking in its absurdity — more like contending that Obama’s entire inaugural crowd was computer-generated imagery, or that Ukraine is actually a fictional country, or that hydroxychloroquine is the long-sought elixir of eternal life. Trump is no longer asking his followers to believe the implausible. He is insisting that they accept a story as incredible as Pizzagate or the CIA assassination of John F. Kennedy. https://www.washingtonpost.com/opini...7e8_story.html
Perhaps one should be surprised that his followers are willing to accept even bigger lies when he is confronting them in the role of the loser. But it seems the very idea of Trump losing is one they simply cannot accept. And, the seemingly everlasting source of lies (ironically trusted by many people who claim to believe the truth should set us free) is willing to feed them with new ones. And bigger ones if needed. Unfortunately, we are not seeing the end of it yet. Fortunately, they have lost influence to the degree they used to have.
Comment