It's impossible to tell the difference between sarcasm and sincere liberalism.
Announcement
Collapse
Civics 101 Guidelines
Want to argue about politics? Healthcare reform? Taxes? Governments? You've come to the right place!
Try to keep it civil though. The rules still apply here.
Try to keep it civil though. The rules still apply here.
See more
See less
Trump's attacks American judge as Mexican
Collapse
X
-
Originally posted by Leonhard View PostAbout the only thing he's good at is being gross, dumb and saying politically incorrect things. Somehow that tickles the tea party movement.
It'd be fascinating if it wasn't so potentially destructive
Comment
-
Originally posted by Leonhard View PostTrump's successes aren't exactly consistent, he's good at rubbing the bill off on others when they collapse. If you count that as succeeding then sure. He's a litigious, serial liar, and a bully as well.
About the only thing he's good at is being gross, dumb and saying politically incorrect things. Somehow that tickles the tea party movement.
There is no doubt that Trump is nuts. From the birther conspiracy theory he pushed hard on, or his flirting with 9/11 inside job conspiracy, that senator Rafael Cruz had a hand in the assassination of Kennedy, him buying into email scams such as a story of a guy who killed muslims with bullets dipped in pigs blood (a scam story), that Mexico is deliberately exporting criminals into the country, that vaccines cause autism, that "global warming" is a hoax invented for nefarious purposes, that voter fraud is a problem that immigrants are exploting, that Obama was won in because of dead voters (at least he claims that they overwhelming voted for Obama)...
Of course Trump is very smooth about it. All of his endorsements of these conspiracy theories aren't done entirely. There's always a level of evasiveness about it. If you like him, and you're fanboying, you can always say he didn't exactly, really, explicitly, fully and completely said that Obama was an African Muslim named Barry Sotowo... he only said that he'd heard that, and it might be true, and why hasn't Obama released the full form birth certificate (the green one), isn't he hiding something... I'm only saying....
Which is the way most conspiracy theorists talk (short of Alex Jones types and Coast to Coast Radio).
Either he buys into that stuff, or he intentionally is appealing to the kind of people who are. I don't know which of these are scarier. One implies a dangerous president, the other implies a conservative party that's lost its integrity.
I wonder if Trump isn't just using persuasion and negotiation techniques a lot. He makes an 'outrageous' opening statement to frame the negotiation, and then retreats to a 'more reasonable' position, which people can agree to. But perhaps the 'more reasonable' position is much closer to what Trump wanted from the start, than what the other party would have accepted if it was offered right away. I recommend a look at Scott Adams' blog (of 'Dilbert' fame) for lots on analysis of Trump's negotiating techniques....>>> Witty remark or snarky quote of another poster goes here <<<...
Comment
-
Originally posted by MaxVel View PostI wonder if Trump isn't just using persuasion and negotiation techniques a lot. He makes an 'outrageous' opening statement to frame the negotiation, and then retreats to a 'more reasonable' position, which people can agree to. But perhaps the 'more reasonable' position is much closer to what Trump wanted from the start, than what the other party would have accepted if it was offered right away. I recommend a look at Scott Adams' blog (of 'Dilbert' fame) for lots on analysis of Trump's negotiating techniques.
Comment
-
Originally posted by MaxVel View PostI wonder if Trump isn't just using persuasion and negotiation techniques a lot. He makes an 'outrageous' opening statement to frame the negotiation, and then retreats to a 'more reasonable' position, which people can agree to. But perhaps the 'more reasonable' position is much closer to what Trump wanted from the start, than what the other party would have accepted if it was offered right away. I recommend a look at Scott Adams' blog (of 'Dilbert' fame) for lots on analysis of Trump's negotiating techniques.
Comment
-
Originally posted by Mountain Man View PostAnd now... the rest of the story:
Last edited by shunyadragon; 06-07-2016, 08:13 AM.
Comment
-
The judge is a member of an ethnic lawyer's advocacy group. Trump has taken positions on immigration by that ethnic group that that lawyer's group would likely oppose. That I think does raise at least the question of the judge's ability to be impartial in a case involving Trump.
Originally posted by ShunyadragonI do not consider Breirbart hardly an unbiased source.
Virtually all the Republican Party leadership has seriously questioned or condemned Trumps actions in this case.
Originally posted by ShunyadragonThis is not the rest of the story . . . please come again with a less biased source that does not mistranslate 'la raza.' In this case 'la raza' does not translate as 'race.'
Originally posted by ReutersTrump on Sunday repeated his attack on Curiel in an interview on CBS's "Face the Nation."
"He's a member of a club or society very strongly pro-Mexican, which is all fine. But I say he's got bias," Trump said in the interview.
"This judge has treated me very unfairly. He's treated me in a hostile manner, and there's something going on," he added.
The words "La Raza" translate from Spanish to mean "the race," which Trump fans cite as proof the NCLR is a group of people who hate anyone who isn't Hispanic.
Lisa Navarrete, an NCLR spokeswoman, rejected that interpretation, saying that "thousands" of groups had names that included "La Raza" as a "nod to our common heritage."
The attacks on the advocacy group are the latest signs of the increasing racial tension in the 2016 presidential race. Critics have said Trump's calls to deport undocumented immigrants and ban Muslims amount to racism. His supporters say he's defending the country from terrorism and violence.
Some supporters of the New York businessman have blamed the NCLR for the violent clashes between anti-Trump protesters and Trump fans at a San Jose, California, rally last week.
Source.
Obviously there is some confusion by some people between the lawyer's advocacy group and the National Council of La Raza (NCLR). Nonetheless, in the current political climate, I think Trump well within his rights to ask questions about the judge's impartiality....>>> Witty remark or snarky quote of another poster goes here <<<...
Comment
-
Originally posted by shunyadragon View PostFirst, there is nothing wrong nor extreme about the association "La Raza"...
15 things you should know about "The Race"
And, yes, the term "la raza" literally means "the race".
Some may call me foolish, and some may call me odd
But I'd rather be a fool in the eyes of man
Than a fool in the eyes of God
From "Fools Gold" by Petra
Comment
-
Originally posted by MaxVel View PostObviously there is some confusion by some people between the lawyer's advocacy group and the National Council of La Raza (NCLR). Nonetheless, in the current political climate, I think Trump well within his rights to ask questions about the judge's impartiality.
So, yes, Trump is 100% correct to question whether or not this is a judge who can give him a fair hearing.Some may call me foolish, and some may call me odd
But I'd rather be a fool in the eyes of man
Than a fool in the eyes of God
From "Fools Gold" by Petra
Comment
-
Originally posted by Mountain Man View PostYour ignorance is showing. A significant part of La Raza's mission is to aid and abet those who enter the US illegally and opposes any kind of policy that would make illegal entry more difficult.
15 things you should know about "The Race"
And, yes, the term "la raza" literally means "the race".
Comment
-
Originally posted by MaxVel View PostI wonder if Trump isn't just using persuasion and negotiation techniques a lot. He makes an 'outrageous' opening statement to frame the negotiation, and then retreats to a 'more reasonable' position, which people can agree to. But perhaps the 'more reasonable' position is much closer to what Trump wanted from the start, than what the other party would have accepted if it was offered right away. I recommend a look at Scott Adams' blog (of 'Dilbert' fame) for lots on analysis of Trump's negotiating techniques.
Comment
-
Senator Kirk of Illinois considers Donnie's ethnic racist abuse of the Judge the 'last straw' and resends support.
Of course if 'good ol' Donnie makes emotional heart felt phooney staged apologies they turkey flock may flip flop again and follow the rail of corn kernels.Last edited by shunyadragon; 06-07-2016, 05:57 PM.
Comment
Related Threads
Collapse
Topics | Statistics | Last Post | ||
---|---|---|---|---|
Started by rogue06, Yesterday, 03:49 PM
|
6 responses
55 views
0 likes
|
Last Post
by rogue06
Yesterday, 09:18 PM
|
||
Started by seer, 06-28-2024, 11:42 AM
|
17 responses
137 views
0 likes
|
Last Post
by JimL
Yesterday, 12:04 PM
|
||
Started by Cow Poke, 06-28-2024, 10:24 AM
|
5 responses
72 views
0 likes
|
Last Post
by Cow Poke
Yesterday, 03:22 PM
|
||
Started by VonTastrophe, 06-28-2024, 10:22 AM
|
17 responses
115 views
0 likes
|
Last Post
![]()
by Terraceth
Yesterday, 04:22 PM
|
||
Started by VonTastrophe, 06-27-2024, 01:08 PM
|
51 responses
311 views
0 likes
|
Last Post
by rogue06
Yesterday, 10:03 AM
|
Comment