seer
I have cited this source several times in the previous Tweb and once in the prior thread on 'Climate Change.' Here is the post from the previous thread . . .
This text shows graphs and descriptions of predictions our planet should be going into a cooling cycle based on long term ~100,000 year cycles, and shorter cycles (~100 to 200 year cycles). It also shows the effect of global climate change moderating with warming trends of these 'Natural' predicted cyclic cooling trends, but still predicts short term cooling possible. Did you ever even look at this text when I referenced it?
Other graphs in other references in the previous thread showed data reflecting this 100,000 year climate cycle, shorter cycles, and showed the projected cooling trends of the shorter cycles we should be in.
Avoid layman tunnel vision with an agenda when dealing with science. Do your homework and do not selectively reference sources that agree with. In the previous thread you referenced lay sources that selectively reference cooling trends of 10 to 20 years as evidence that global warming is false. When all these time periods are put into the context of longer periods of time the trends do reflect global warming.
I have cited this source several times in the previous Tweb and once in the prior thread on 'Climate Change.' Here is the post from the previous thread . . .
Originally posted by shunyadragon
Other graphs in other references in the previous thread showed data reflecting this 100,000 year climate cycle, shorter cycles, and showed the projected cooling trends of the shorter cycles we should be in.
Avoid layman tunnel vision with an agenda when dealing with science. Do your homework and do not selectively reference sources that agree with. In the previous thread you referenced lay sources that selectively reference cooling trends of 10 to 20 years as evidence that global warming is false. When all these time periods are put into the context of longer periods of time the trends do reflect global warming.
Comment