Announcement

Collapse

Natural Science 301 Guidelines

This is an open forum area for all members for discussions on all issues of science and origins. This area will and does get volatile at times, but we ask that it be kept to a dull roar, and moderators will intervene to keep the peace if necessary. This means obvious trolling and flaming that becomes a problem will be dealt with, and you might find yourself in the doghouse.

As usual, Tweb rules apply. If you haven't read them now would be a good time.

Forum Rules: Here
See more
See less

The Biblical Big Bang

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • #76
    Originally posted by lee_merrill View Post
    Well, interesting, we'll see! But I think the consensus view is still the Big Bang.

    Blessings,
    Lee
    No, you are assuming an absolute beginning from nothing of a Big Bang and very very few scientists, maybe no reputable sscientist support this religious notion.

    Comment


    • #77
      Originally posted by Stoic View Post
      The consensus view is still the Big Bang, but the cyclic models (of which there are many) are compatible with the Big Bang.
      All those that believe in a Big Bang do not believe our universe had an absolute beginning.

      Comment


      • #78
        Originally posted by shunyadragon View Post
        All those that believe in a Big Bang do not believe our universe had an absolute beginning.
        Yes, that was my intended point.

        Comment


        • #79
          Originally posted by rogue06 View Post
          Much of the initial opposition to the Big Bang theory from some scientists was that it too closely resembled what is written in Genesis.
          Can you cite any examples of such opposition?
          America - too good to let the conservatives drag it back to 1950.

          Comment


          • #80
            Originally posted by Electric Skeptic View Post
            Can you cite any examples of such opposition?
            . . . and refer it as citing that it is in opposition, because 'it too closely resembled what is written in Genesis.'

            Comment


            • #81
              Originally posted by shunyadragon View Post
              . . . and refer it as citing that it is in opposition, because 'it too closely resembled what is written in Genesis.'
              Yes, exactly - that is what I meant, if I wasn't clear.
              America - too good to let the conservatives drag it back to 1950.

              Comment


              • #82
                Originally posted by Electric Skeptic View Post
                Yes, exactly - that is what I meant, if I wasn't clear.
                I just wanted remove any 'wiggle room.'

                Comment

                Related Threads

                Collapse

                Topics Statistics Last Post
                Started by rogue06, 04-27-2024, 09:38 AM
                0 responses
                11 views
                1 like
                Last Post rogue06
                by rogue06
                 
                Started by shunyadragon, 04-26-2024, 10:10 PM
                5 responses
                23 views
                0 likes
                Last Post shunyadragon  
                Started by shunyadragon, 04-25-2024, 08:37 PM
                2 responses
                12 views
                0 likes
                Last Post shunyadragon  
                Started by eider, 04-14-2024, 03:22 AM
                64 responses
                222 views
                0 likes
                Last Post rogue06
                by rogue06
                 
                Started by Ronson, 04-08-2024, 09:05 PM
                41 responses
                169 views
                0 likes
                Last Post Ronson
                by Ronson
                 
                Working...
                X