Guess what buddy, I am a Gentile, so what are you even talking about? In any case, Jesus told his apostles(and Paul), they told others who told others. The message was also written down and copied meticulously over the centuries. The gospel message was told to me in the 1990's. I have been a Christian since I was 8 years old. In my teen years I studied apologetic resources and am fully convinced of the truth of Jesus and His Resurrection from the dead. No mere internet fundy can tell me otherwise.
Announcement
Collapse
Unorthodox Theology 201 Guidelines
Theists only.
This forum area is primarily for persons who would identify themselves as Christians whether or not their theology is recognized within the mainstream or as orthodox though other theists may participate with moderator permission. Therefore those that would be restricted from posting in Christianity 201 due to a disagreement with the enumerated doctrines, ie the Trinity, the Creatorship of God, the virgin birth, the bodily resurrection of Christ, the atonement, the future bodily return of Christ, the future bodily resurrection of the just and the unjust, and the final judgment may freely post here on any theological subject matter. In this case "unorthodox" is used in the strict sense of a person who denies what has been declared as universal essentials of the historic Christian faith. Examples would be adherents to Oneness, Full Preterists, Unitarian Universalist Christians, Gnostics, Liberal Christianity, Christian Science to name a few.
The second purpose will be for threads on subjects, which although the thread starter has no issue with the above doctrines, the subject matter is so very outside the bounds of normative Christian doctrine totally within the leadership's discretion that it is placed here. In so doing, no judgment or offense is intended to be placed on the belief of said person in the above-doctrines. In this case "unorthodox" is used in a much looser sense of "outside the norms" - Examples of such threads would be pro-polygamy, pro-drug use, proponents of gay Christian churches, proponents of abortion.
The third purpose is for persons who wish to have input from any and all who would claim the title of Christian even on subjects that would be considered "orthodox."
The philosophy behind this area was to recognize that there are persons who would identify themselves as Christian and thus seem out of place in the Comparative Religions Forum, but yet in keeping with our committment here to certain basic core Christian doctrines. Also, it allows threads to be started by those who would want to still be identified as Christian with a particular belief that while not denying an essential is of such a nature that the discussion on that issue belongs in this section or for threads by persons who wish such a non-restricted discussion.
Forum Rules: Here
This forum area is primarily for persons who would identify themselves as Christians whether or not their theology is recognized within the mainstream or as orthodox though other theists may participate with moderator permission. Therefore those that would be restricted from posting in Christianity 201 due to a disagreement with the enumerated doctrines, ie the Trinity, the Creatorship of God, the virgin birth, the bodily resurrection of Christ, the atonement, the future bodily return of Christ, the future bodily resurrection of the just and the unjust, and the final judgment may freely post here on any theological subject matter. In this case "unorthodox" is used in the strict sense of a person who denies what has been declared as universal essentials of the historic Christian faith. Examples would be adherents to Oneness, Full Preterists, Unitarian Universalist Christians, Gnostics, Liberal Christianity, Christian Science to name a few.
The second purpose will be for threads on subjects, which although the thread starter has no issue with the above doctrines, the subject matter is so very outside the bounds of normative Christian doctrine totally within the leadership's discretion that it is placed here. In so doing, no judgment or offense is intended to be placed on the belief of said person in the above-doctrines. In this case "unorthodox" is used in a much looser sense of "outside the norms" - Examples of such threads would be pro-polygamy, pro-drug use, proponents of gay Christian churches, proponents of abortion.
The third purpose is for persons who wish to have input from any and all who would claim the title of Christian even on subjects that would be considered "orthodox."
The philosophy behind this area was to recognize that there are persons who would identify themselves as Christian and thus seem out of place in the Comparative Religions Forum, but yet in keeping with our committment here to certain basic core Christian doctrines. Also, it allows threads to be started by those who would want to still be identified as Christian with a particular belief that while not denying an essential is of such a nature that the discussion on that issue belongs in this section or for threads by persons who wish such a non-restricted discussion.
Forum Rules: Here
See more
See less
Rapture, Millineum, & the 3 last Jewish Feasts.
Collapse
X
-
Originally posted by Christianbookworm View PostWhat is up with this FEB? He posted another thread about Jews and Gentiles and prophecies and acted like I wasn't a believer if I couldn't interpret his messed up ideas.
A) is a meonlyist
2) has a language barrier problem
C) is a bit on the looney side
The first to state his case seems right until another comes and cross-examines him.
Comment
-
Originally posted by Christianbookworm View PostHe probably won't get my Batman reference?The first to state his case seems right until another comes and cross-examines him.
Comment
-
Originally posted by Christianbookworm View PostWhere's he from? Asia?The first to state his case seems right until another comes and cross-examines him.
Comment
-
Originally posted by Christianbookworm View PostHe ain't a Kryptonian.The first to state his case seems right until another comes and cross-examines him.
Comment
-
Originally posted by Christianbookworm View PostI thought that was the Vulcans?The first to state his case seems right until another comes and cross-examines him.
Comment
-
Originally posted by Truthseeker View PostI googled that word and went like this Bing said nothing came up for a definition of meonlyist. I'm impressed Cow Poke used a term that Bing couldn't get. All of the Internet. Wow.
FEB: Me ONLY
Hence, a "me only ist"The first to state his case seems right until another comes and cross-examines him.
Comment
widgetinstance 221 (Related Threads) skipped due to lack of content & hide_module_if_empty option.
Comment