Originally posted by robrecht
View Post
Sen was specific when he referred to 'propositional inerrancy and infallibility,' and I agree with his assessment of the problem. You actually missed my efforts to edit with more clarification. I believe in 'progressive inerrancy and infallibility' which describes the evolving nature of Divine knowledge for ALL of humanity, and not the narrow 'propositional inerrancy and infallibility' in the Roman Church, and in a more restrictive form in Fundamentalist Christianity. The reference I provided gives some good dialogue into the evolving Baha'i view.
Comment