Originally posted by JimL
View Post
Science does not define why(?).
Great, I'd appreciate it, because if as you say Popper doesn't consider the will to be the effect of natural and deterministic laws, I'd be interested to know what he thinks the will is determined, or rather freely determined by.
It maybe in the future that science may be able to determine the nature and extent of human will, and the degree of freedom, but at present it is a philosophical question most often based on the assumptions of belief and non-belief.
Comment