Originally posted by seer
View Post
Originally posted by seer
View Post
Originally posted by seer
View Post
Originally posted by seer
View Post
Originally posted by seer
View Post
![huh](https://theologyweb.com/campus/core/images/smilies/huh.gif)
Seer, you have not backed me into a corner in a single one of our discussions. You barely ever have an actual argument. The "you cannot prove god exists" is simply anecdotal: you are making claims about a hypothetical being you cannot show exists - rendering the entire discussion hypothetical and unlinked to reality. I have noted I am not a christian anymore (but once was) several times (just as you have noted you were once non-Christian and now are), and those comments on my part have never been intended to be part of any argument I have made. Again - they are anecdotal observations - nothing more.
Originally posted by seer
View Post
Originally posted by seer
View Post
![shrug](https://theologyweb.com/campus/core/images/smilies/shrug.gif)
Originally posted by seer
View Post
Originally posted by seer
View Post
The ability to impose consequences do not make a moral position "binding" or make the moralizer "the authority." It simply means they have more power.
As for the laws of logic/mathematics - my ignoring them does not change the fact that they describe how reality works (as opposed to what some being thinks is the right/wrong way to act). I am not capable of altering how reality works. Neither (apparently) is your god. You want that to be because laws of logic/mathematics source themselves to god, but that is an assertion without a basis - and one not widely held by your Christian peers. I frankly do not take it that seriously. You can continue to repeat it over and over again - but that doesn't make it true. It just makes it what you think.
![shrug](https://theologyweb.com/campus/core/images/smilies/shrug.gif)
Comment