Originally posted by Anomaly
View Post
Then you will have to overcome the problem of how a relative/symbolic representation (i.e., language) can be used to articulate absolutes. I don't see how you get there.
Originally posted by Anomaly
View Post
Originally posted by Anomaly
View Post
Originally posted by Anomaly
View Post
Originally posted by Anomaly
View Post
As best I can tell, trying to parse the crypto-speak, you object to the fact that any sentient mind is subjectively related to its environs. We assume (and cannot show) that the universe has an objective reality - but none of us can experience it objectively - our experience of it will always be subjective. Like it or no - that's what we have to work with.
Originally posted by Anomaly
View Post
Originally posted by Anomaly
View Post
Originally posted by Anomaly
View Post
Sorry, Ano - I am not trying to be disrespectful, but I don't even try to answer questions I do not understand - especially when they appear to framed in a way designed to make them obtuse.
Originally posted by Anomaly
View Post
Look, Ano - you may coome to the same conclusion that I think Matt (and a couple others) have come to here: I'm simply out of their league and not worth having a discussion with. If that is what you conclude, so be it - and nice to meet you. If not, then you are going to have to simplify your posts. I believe Seer called it "dumbing down." In my experience, most concepts can be expressed intelligibly, so even the "lay person" can follow the discussion. I'm happy to engage with those.
If that makes me intellectually lazy (as others have concluded)... so be it
Comment