Originally posted by Sparko
View Post
If you want to explain how it IS sound and IS valid - then you simply need to show how you go about demonstrating that Premise 1 and Premise 2 do NOT shift context, and how you can show both of them to be true. You need the former to show soundness. You need the latter to show validity. Then you have to do the same for Premise 3 added by Craig.
Otherwise, the KCA comes to a conclusion that has not been shown to be true. It also has not been proven to be false. It merely...isn't anything...
Comment