Originally posted by seer
View Post
"Charles you are being hypocritical again, if my claims are unfounded what are yours?" Personal attack and nothing to support it, rather easy.
"If God does not offer a just universe, with certain universal moral truths - what could?" It does not follow that god can do this even if nothing else can. You seem to forget this point all the time. You cannot answer why what you call just actually is just. It would be just if it was the opposite as long as it was from god according to your definition of what constitutes good. And you seem to forget that if no good exists prior to god's choice one can hardly claim his choise was good. It is not as if the two need to contradict each other. Even god needs those truths in order to be good. Or else good is just a whatever-word....
"In the end, there is no moral direction in your worldview, no certain or universal moral truths, no inherent purpose for humankind." Completely wrong. Who are you trying to fool. You may disagree with my reasoning but that does not change the fact that in my view there is moral direction, certain universal moral truths and purpose for humankind. Sorry to disappoint you seer. But you are not getting away with those wrong statements about my worldview.
"This is clear since you can not even venture a definition for goodness that is not circular." Still looking for you to prove my wordview about which you have made so many wrong statements circular. You may want to read some of my posts in here again: http://www.theologyweb.com/campus/sh...tion-of-ethics
So, I perhaps now you can answer the questions instead of trying to change subject with false claims and unsupported statements over and over again? Or, perhaps that is all you have got?
Comment