Originally posted by Charles
View Post
2) If that is a something you take for granted to always be the case that is, of course, circular. It could be the case that you actually saw the world directly. That is all I am saying in that part. That leaving the possibility completely out is circular.
3) seer, you know better than that. I have made it very clear and I do not want to start all over just because you ignore, forget or don't read.
4) Then it should be easy to prove the points wrong. I think I have made myself very clear on how it is self refuting, and you have completely failed to show why that is wrong.
4) Then it should be easy to prove the points wrong. I think I have made myself very clear on how it is self refuting, and you have completely failed to show why that is wrong.
And just remember, seer. You do not have assumption based on your own premises.
Comment