My point is not macro vs micro, but that many things in science are counter-intuitive, yet are still true and self-consistent. A large part of learning science is retraining one's intuition, whether wave-particle duality, relativity, or a host of other issues.
Theology, likewise, has a number of claims which are counter-intuitive, e.g. the hypostatic union and the Trinity. But this does NOT mean that they are inconsistent.
Theology, likewise, has a number of claims which are counter-intuitive, e.g. the hypostatic union and the Trinity. But this does NOT mean that they are inconsistent.
Comment