Originally posted by JimL
View Post
If nature didn't exist, then neither would the so called laws, because of themselves, laws have no real existence. Put it this way, an atom doesn't say to itself, Oh its the law so I'd better act accordingly, it just does what it does, it follows its own nature, and we call that a law.
I said, 'Science deals with the matter of fact existence of matter and energy, and the [ultimate] Laws of Nature,' which is about all that can be say without falling off the edge.
Not a meaningful way to approach this discussion. Simply 'If nothing exists, therefore nothing exists,' is not coherent.
Comment