Hi, and welcome to thread of Demi on arguments not to use
Please only discuss/comment argument listed by Demi here, not other arguments. If you think other arguments belong here on 'arguments not to use' pm Demi and maybe he post it.
Number 1)
Please don't say this (or stuff like this), cos
A) Laws of physics is description, not prescription (very very very basic point)
B) Current standard theories of physics has contradiction when put together (basic). So please don't go 'X can't happen, cos self-contradictory physics says so!!!', is big failure as philosophical argument.
Please only discuss/comment argument listed by Demi here, not other arguments. If you think other arguments belong here on 'arguments not to use' pm Demi and maybe he post it.
Number 1)
If our brain cause our thoughts, and our brains are material, our brains follow the laws of physics and there is no way for our mind to effect that since our mind would have to produce a force that overcomes the natural forces in nature, and that would violate the laws of physics, ie. a miracle.
Please don't say this (or stuff like this), cos
A) Laws of physics is description, not prescription (very very very basic point)
B) Current standard theories of physics has contradiction when put together (basic). So please don't go 'X can't happen, cos self-contradictory physics says so!!!', is big failure as philosophical argument.
Comment