Self-Refuting or Self-denial fallacy

[seer]

No, simplistic foolish moronic physical facts does not address the issues in philosophy and logic.

Then answer me Shuny, can true contradictions exist - yes or no?

[shunyadragon]

A simple reading comprehension of his example shows that the fallacy would be being committed by the original person, not the one asking if that were absolutely true, depending on the answer to that question.

From your original link With you and seers names substituted.:

A non-fallacious dialog:

Shuny: "There is no absolute truth."
Seer: "So is THAT absolutely true??" (asked rhetorically)
Shuny: "I don't know. In my worldview, my statements are probability based; they're not based on a false sense of certainty."

As Bo says: The fallacy is in making a self defeating statement, not in questioning if it is self-defeating.

So if the conversation went like this:
Shuny: "There is no absolute truth"
Seer: "So is THAT absolutely true?"
Shuny: "Yes!"

Then You, Shuny, would be the one committing the fallacy of a self-defeating statement. Seer would not have committed a fallacy in either example. THAT is what BO said in his page. Go read it again. You just basically shot yourself in the foot and everyone can see it but you.

I eagerly await you putting your fingers in your ears and going "nananananana, I can't hear you!!" and repeating yourself.

Your imaginary dialogue with the rabbit from Alice of Wonderland does not accurately quote my posts.

For example; I never mentioned the issue of probability in any of my posts.

[seer]

Your imaginary dialogue with the rabbit from Alice of Wonderland does not accurately quote my posts.

For example; I never mentioned the issue of probability in any of my posts.

Shuny, can true contradictions exist - yes or no?

[Bill the Cat]

Your imaginary dialogue with the rabbit from Alice of Wonderland does not accurately quote my posts.

For example; I never mentioned the issue of probability in any of my posts.

choreo.gif

Dance, Dance Revolution!!!

[shunyadragon]

[ATTACH=CONFIG]16636[/ATTACH]

Dance, Dance Revolution!!!

Yes, this represents sparkos foolishness, and misrepresentation of my posts.

[shunyadragon]

Shuny, can true contradictions exist - yes or no?

Answered that many many times.

This does not address the issue that sparko misquoted and misrepresented my posts.

[Sparko]

Your imaginary dialogue with the rabbit from Alice of Wonderland does not accurately quote my posts.

For example; I never mentioned the issue of probability in any of my posts.

I was showing you what BO said in his posts, from your own link, using your and Seer's names instead to show you the relative positions of the argument and what would make it fallacious or not.

Basically you said that humans can never know absolute truths.
Seer asked you if you were absolutely sure.

That was not a fallacy on his part. It was pointing out the POTENTIAL fallacy on your part. If you were to answer "yes" then it would have been a fallacy on your part. It was NEVER a fallacy on Seer's part.

As expected, you just put your fingers in your ears and ignore everything while everyone looks at you and laughs at your ridiculous claims.

[shunyadragon]

I was showing you what BO said in his posts, from your own link, using your and Seer's names instead to show you the relative positions of the argument and what would make it fallacious or not.

Again Bo refers to seer's statement as a fallacy

Basically you said that humans can never know absolute truths.
Seer asked you if you were absolutely sure.

Which is fundamentally a fallacy in different ways as documented.

That was not a fallacy on his part. It was pointing out the POTENTIAL fallacy on your part. If you were to answer "yes" then it would have been a fallacy on your part. It was NEVER a fallacy on Seer's part.

The statement is a fallacy in any argument and in any context.

As expected, you just put your fingers in your ears and ignore everything while everyone looks at you and laughs at your ridiculous claims.

As expected . . .

Your imaginary dialogue with the rabbit from Alice of Wonderland does not accurately quote my posts.

For example; I never mentioned the issue of probability in any of my posts.

[Bill the Cat]

Yes, this represents sparkos foolishness, and misrepresentation of my posts.

It represents your dancing to avoid admitting you made a mistake. And you did make one.

[Sparko]

As expected . . .

Your imaginary dialogue with the rabbit from Alice of Wonderland does not accurately quote my posts.

For example; I never mentioned the issue of probability in any of my posts.

annnd we are in repeat mode. Great.

Your entire thread trying to blame Seer for committing a logical fallacy, is incorrect. The only person who committed a logical fallacy is you. And everyone is now laughing at your ridiculous stance and position of self-denial.

This is you Shuny:

[seer]

Answered that many many times.

No you haven't, stop fibbing - can true contradictions exist - yes or no?

[shunyadragon]

It represents your dancing to avoid admitting you made a mistake. And you did make one.

What mistake?

[Bill the Cat]

What mistake?

exerciser.gif chickendance.gif dancinspidey.gif

[shunyadragon]

[ATTACH=CONFIG]16637[/ATTACH] [ATTACH=CONFIG]16638[/ATTACH] [ATTACH=CONFIG]16639[/ATTACH]

Duck, Bob and Weave in Alice in Wonderland

[shunyadragon]

annnd we are in repeat mode. Great.

Your entire thread trying to blame Seer for committing a logical fallacy, is incorrect. The only person who committed a logical fallacy is you. And everyone is now laughing at your ridiculous stance and position of self-denial.

This is you Shuny:

Answered that many many times.

This does not address the issue that sparko misquoted and misrepresented my posts.