Campbell died some 30 years ago, so he doesn't count as a "current scholar," and therefore not one of the "more and more" scholars that hold views about anything. His area of interest reflected pretty much the new age general deism to some extent, and that area only peripherally touches on fields relevant to the historicity of Christ. Not that I count it particularly relevant (I've known a couple of people without tertiary qualifications who could run rings around professors), but Campbell didn't hold a PhD.
Surely you could propose a better start.
Surely you could propose a better start.
Comment