Originally posted by shunyadragon
View Post
I have basically have given my case of the critique of Plantinga's beliefs in 'proper function and Warrant.'
(1) Plantinga's 'proper function' requires 'design'
(2) Plantinga believes the only viable 'designer is God.
(3) Plantinga does not support nor believe in the scientific Theory of Evolution.
(4) Plantinga's belief in the Theory of Evolution is not accepted by academic science.
(5) Plantinga does not endorse Methodological Naturalism.
(6) Plantinga believes in the Intelligent Design advocated by the Dover Board of Education and the Discovery Institute.
(7) There is no basis in science for the support of Plantinga's belief in design.'
(8) Plantinga's 'proper function,' proper belief,' and Warrant are based on the Cavinist Reformed Epistemology.
I will continue to cite sources, and pursue this debate. Good well reasoned rebuttals with references, particularly from Plantinga welcome. Name calling, rants and off topic stuff not welcome.
(1) Plantinga's 'proper function' requires 'design'
(2) Plantinga believes the only viable 'designer is God.
(3) Plantinga does not support nor believe in the scientific Theory of Evolution.
(4) Plantinga's belief in the Theory of Evolution is not accepted by academic science.
(5) Plantinga does not endorse Methodological Naturalism.
(6) Plantinga believes in the Intelligent Design advocated by the Dover Board of Education and the Discovery Institute.
(7) There is no basis in science for the support of Plantinga's belief in design.'
(8) Plantinga's 'proper function,' proper belief,' and Warrant are based on the Cavinist Reformed Epistemology.
I will continue to cite sources, and pursue this debate. Good well reasoned rebuttals with references, particularly from Plantinga welcome. Name calling, rants and off topic stuff not welcome.
Leave a comment: