Originally posted by One Bad Pig
View Post
Announcement
Collapse
Eschatology 201 Guidelines
This area of the forum is primarily for Christian theists to discuss orthodox views of Eschatology. Other theist participation is welcome within that framework, but only within orthodoxy. Posts from nontheists that do not promote atheism or seek to undermine the faith of others will be permitted at the Moderator's discretion - such posters should contact the area moderators before posting.
Without turning this forum into a 'hill of foreskins' (Joshua 5:3), I believe we can still have fun with this 'sensitive' topic.
However, don't be misled, dispensationalism has only partly to do with circumcision issues. So, let's not forget about Innocence, Conscience, Promises, Kingdoms and so on.
End time -isms within orthodox Christianity also discussed here. Clearly unorthodox doctrines, such as those advocating "pantelism/full preterism/Neo-Hymenaeanism" or the denial of any essential of the historic Christian faith are not permitted in this section but can be discussed in Comparative Religions 101 without restriction. Any such threads, as well as any that within the moderator's discretions fall outside mainstream evangelical belief, will be moved to the appropriate area.
Millennialism- post-, pre- a-
Futurism, Historicism, Idealism, and Preterism, or just your garden variety Zionism.
From the tribulation to the anichrist. Whether your tastes run from Gary DeMar to Tim LaHaye or anywhere in between, your input is welcome here.
OK folks, let's roll!
Forum Rules: Here
Without turning this forum into a 'hill of foreskins' (Joshua 5:3), I believe we can still have fun with this 'sensitive' topic.
However, don't be misled, dispensationalism has only partly to do with circumcision issues. So, let's not forget about Innocence, Conscience, Promises, Kingdoms and so on.
End time -isms within orthodox Christianity also discussed here. Clearly unorthodox doctrines, such as those advocating "pantelism/full preterism/Neo-Hymenaeanism" or the denial of any essential of the historic Christian faith are not permitted in this section but can be discussed in Comparative Religions 101 without restriction. Any such threads, as well as any that within the moderator's discretions fall outside mainstream evangelical belief, will be moved to the appropriate area.
Millennialism- post-, pre- a-
Futurism, Historicism, Idealism, and Preterism, or just your garden variety Zionism.
From the tribulation to the anichrist. Whether your tastes run from Gary DeMar to Tim LaHaye or anywhere in between, your input is welcome here.
OK folks, let's roll!
Forum Rules: Here
See more
See less
Does preterism lead to atheism?
Collapse
X
-
-
Jesus' 1st coming was predicted to the very day by Daniel, but He doesn't even want us spitballing about His 2nd coming. Makes sense. I guess as long as it's just Christians in Africa, Asia and the Middle East being murdered for their faith, it doesn't really matter when He comes back. They're just second class Christians anyway. God bless America.
Comment
-
Of course it's horrible that people are murdering Christians. And someday justice will be done. I don't see what human rights violations have to do with eschatology. The first few centuries of Church history had horrible persecutions also. Has there been any century where Christians weren't martyred somewhere for their faith?If it weren't for the Resurrection of Jesus, we'd all be in DEEP TROUBLE!
Comment
-
Preterists maintain that Satan is bound and the world is getting better as it is being conquered for Christ. Futurists maintain that Satan is not yet bound and the world will get progressively worse until Christ comes physically to establish His kingdom on earth.
Who seems right to you?
Comment
-
Originally posted by Darfius View PostPreterists maintain that Satan is bound and the world is getting better as it is being conquered for Christ."It's evolution; every time you invent something fool-proof, the world invents a better fool."
-Unknown
"Preach the gospel, and if necessary use words." - Most likely St.Francis
I find that evolution is the best proof of God.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
I support the :
sigpic
Comment
-
Originally posted by Irate Canadian View PostCitation needed.
Comment
-
Originally posted by Irate Canadian View PostCitation needed.
http://www.preteristarchive.com/Stud...viization.html
I wish I had access to the old forum because this was a common argument used in my overly enthusiastic debates with the preterists on this board.
Comment
-
Originally posted by Adrift View PostI've actually heard both claims (that Satan is bound, and that things will get better till Christ's second coming) from preterists on this very website, though mostly pre-relaunch. I don't know if either of these claims are required beliefs for a partial preterist view (I suspect not)."It's evolution; every time you invent something fool-proof, the world invents a better fool."
-Unknown
"Preach the gospel, and if necessary use words." - Most likely St.Francis
I find that evolution is the best proof of God.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
I support the :
sigpic
Comment
-
Originally posted by Darfius View PostPreterists maintain that Satan is bound and the world is getting better as it is being conquered for Christ.When I Survey....
Comment
-
Originally posted by Faber View PostThat sounds more like a post-millennial view, the belief that Christians will help usher in a millennium of peace before the Lord's return. What preterists hold that view?
Comment
-
Originally posted by Faber View PostThat sounds more like a post-millennial view, the belief that Christians will help usher in a millennium of peace before the Lord's return. What preterists hold that view?
"In contrast, the orthodox view only holds that Satan is bound from deceiving the nations, and the New Heavens and Earth are yet to come."
http://www.tektonics.org/esch/pretice.php
"...we affirm that Christ reigns as sovereign of the universe; that Satan is bound and defeated; that redemption has been effected."
http://www.tektonics.org/esch/wyngaar01.php
Comment
-
Originally posted by Cerebrum123 View PostIIRC several of the preterists here have said that we are in the millennium now. Darth Xena, and I think Apologia Phoenix have said this, but I'm not 100% certain.
Comment
-
Originally posted by seanD View PostSaying I was cherry-picking without pointing out where I was cherry-picking is just a cheap hand-wave because you have no argument. And I didn't just say they were using calendars only, so stop cherry-picking my posts. It would help if you had an actual counter argument before opening your mouth.Veritas vos Liberabit<>< Learn Greek <>< Look here for an Orthodox Church in America<><Ancient Faith Radio
sigpic
I recommend you do not try too hard and ...research as little as possible. Such weighty things give me a headache. - Shunyadragon, Baha'i apologist
Comment
-
Originally posted by Adrift View PostI've actually heard both claims (that Satan is bound, and that things will get better till Christ's second coming) from preterists on this very website, though mostly pre-relaunch. I don't know if either of these claims are required beliefs for a partial preterist view (I suspect not).Veritas vos Liberabit<>< Learn Greek <>< Look here for an Orthodox Church in America<><Ancient Faith Radio
sigpic
I recommend you do not try too hard and ...research as little as possible. Such weighty things give me a headache. - Shunyadragon, Baha'i apologist
Comment
-
Originally posted by One Bad Pig View PostThe idea that Satan is bound comes from passages like Matt. 12:29; that things will get better till Christ's second coming is an idea held by post-millennialists. Neither idea necessitates a belief in preterism. AFAIK, most or all preterists believe that Satan is bound, at least limiting his influence on the world. Preterists are generally post-millennialists or amillennialists (I hold to the latter), but not all post/a-mills are preterists.
Comment
Comment