Originally posted by Kelp(p)
View Post
Besides, one could perfectly well take an argument made by J. H. Newman in the 1820s - long before he became a Catholic - and think of the pagan things adopted by the Church as being Christian things in a pagan setting, which the Church was reclaiming for Christ, to Whom Alone those things belonged. Following that line, the title "Mother of God" belongs to Mary the Mother of the True God, and not to Isis at all. If all things belong by rights to Christ, as the NT shows they do, then all these "pagan" things belong, not to the pagans & the demons, but to Christ. The same could apply to those mystical phenomena in the Church that have "pagan" parallels. And since He is the Origin & Rationale of all creatures, the whole point of their existence, the universe is Christ-centred; to exist, is to be intended for Christ. So all creation is from its very origin meant totally for Him - it is not neutral in value, but meaningless apart from Him. So in reality, nothing is pagan in origin - in origin, everything is meant for Christ and is in need of Him to redeem & to grace and renew it. The Church has made a beginning of doing this, by using "pagan" things for their proper, Christian, use. So the Rosary would be intended for the praise of God & the recollection of His Saving Works - not for Buddhist use.
Comment