Originally posted by Cow Poke
View Post
Announcement
Collapse
Believer's Baptism
Collapse
X
-
1Cor 15:34 Come to your senses as you ought and stop sinning; for I say to your shame, there are some who know not God.
.⊛⊛⊛⊛⊛⊛⊛⊛⊛⊛⊛⊛⊛⊛⊛⊛⊛⊛⊛⊛⊛⊛
Scripture before Tradition:
but that won't prevent others from
taking it upon themselves to deprive you
of the right to call yourself Christian.
⊛⊛⊛⊛⊛⊛⊛⊛⊛⊛⊛⊛⊛⊛⊛⊛⊛⊛⊛⊛⊛
-
Originally posted by Sparko View PostAnd in 6:5 He says it is symbolic (likeness)
For if we have become united with him in the likeness of his death, we will certainly also be united in the likeness of his resurrection (NET)
And the NET translation continues:
"6 We know that our old man was crucified with him so that the body of sin would no longer dominate us, so that we would no longer be enslaved to sin. 7 (For someone who has died has been freed from sin.)"
And there is no indication in the text that Paul has changed the topic from what happens in baptism to something else, so even if NET is correct in translating it as "likeness of his death/resurrection", the context of the passage itself seems to indicate that this "likeness" is more than just a symbolic (in the modern sense) likeness. Paul is saying that in baptism our "old man" really was crucified with Christ, and not just symbolically (using the word in it's modern sense).
Comment
-
Originally posted by Chrawnus View PostI was baptized as an infant. Even if I did come to believe in believer's baptism I see no reason why I couldn't just believe that my baptism would be valid simply by me consenting, after the fact, to my parents' decision to get me baptized.
(And, no, I'm not offering that as my own argument - just showing that, to many, baptism is a fundamental principle of "I am now a Christ follower")
And, I'd be interested to hear comments on why somebody would think Jesus was publicly baptized as an adult, and was there any kind of claim that He was previously baptized as an infant?The first to state his case seems right until another comes and cross-examines him.
Comment
-
Originally posted by tabibito View PostNow now - there is a patron saint of prostitutes and thieves, after all.The first to state his case seems right until another comes and cross-examines him.
Comment
-
Originally posted by Chrawnus View PostI think the Holy Spirit is at work to draw people to God and them to faith even before baptism (otherwise no one would even choose to get baptized in the first place), but that by itself doesn't invalidate what Paul is clearly teaching about baptism. When it comes to the thief on the cross I can see two options that doesn't conflict with infant baptism. One being that he underwent a so called baptism of desire, that is to say the mere fact that he would have desired to undergo a baptism if only he had the opportunity was enough for God to give him the benefit that He normally confers in baptism. The second option being that even if baptism is the normal means through which God circumcises our heart and gives us a new nature, that doesn't preclude God Himself from at times granting people the benefits of baptism through other means. The fact that we are commanded to baptize people for the forgiveness of sins doesn't mean that God Himself is bound to only forgive those who get baptized.
The simplest and most logical answer is that you are saved when you believe. And that is when you become "a new creature" - because you now are declared righteous and have eternal life. Every verse about being saved includes "belief" even the ones mentioning baptism. So the common denominator is faith.
Now we aren't instantly changed into perfect beings, that is what sanctification is. A process. But when we believe we have eternal life.
Jesus even says you must be born of the spirit to have eternal life and that to be born of the spirit you have to believe in him (John 3)
I was baptized as an infant. Even if I did come to believe in believer's baptism I see no reason why I couldn't just believe that my baptism would be valid simply by me consenting, after the fact, to my parents' decision to get me baptized.
and just assenting to what your parents did is not the same as YOU doing it, as Christ commands.
Comment
-
-
Originally posted by Sparko View PostWhy wouldn't you want to be baptized as a conscious and voluntary confession to your congregation and to Jesus? Are you afraid of water?
and just assenting to what your parents did is not the same as YOU doing it, as Christ commands.
Meanwhile.....
infant baptism.jpgThe first to state his case seems right until another comes and cross-examines him.
Comment
-
Originally posted by tabibito View Postlikeness isn't symbolic, it is analogous to - not exactly the same as. (there was being buried in a tomb, not water: being bodily dead for 3 days as opposed to not bodily dead at all etc.) And verse 3 shows that we are baptised into his death (rather than being baptised into our own deaths.) Then there is the whole remission of sins thing which occurs in baptism.
And again, you are forgiven when you believe, otherwise you could not have eternal life at that point.
Acts 2:38
Then Peter said unto them, Repent, and be baptized every one of you in the name of Jesus Christ for the remission of sins, and ye shall receive the gift of the Holy Ghost.
"for" can mean "because of"
And as I said there are places in the bible where people got the Holy Spirit before baptism.
Comment
-
ομοιωμα does not mean symbolic. But that's only Koine Greek.1Cor 15:34 Come to your senses as you ought and stop sinning; for I say to your shame, there are some who know not God.
.⊛⊛⊛⊛⊛⊛⊛⊛⊛⊛⊛⊛⊛⊛⊛⊛⊛⊛⊛⊛⊛⊛
Scripture before Tradition:
but that won't prevent others from
taking it upon themselves to deprive you
of the right to call yourself Christian.
⊛⊛⊛⊛⊛⊛⊛⊛⊛⊛⊛⊛⊛⊛⊛⊛⊛⊛⊛⊛⊛
Comment
-
At the risk of being the broken record..... again, I'm far more concerned with "if you were to die right now, do you know for sure...."
I don't believe Baptism is necessary for Salvation, so I always try to resolve that first issue (Salvation) first. Generally, I have found that people who have their "Salvation" settled don't have any problem following that up with Believer's Baptism.The first to state his case seems right until another comes and cross-examines him.
Comment
-
Originally posted by Sparko View PostThat is known as "rationalizing"
The simplest and most logical answer is that you are saved when you believe. And that is when you become "a new creature" - because you now are declared righteous and have eternal life. Every verse about being saved includes "belief" even the ones mentioning baptism. So the common denominator is faith.
Now we aren't instantly changed into perfect beings, that is what sanctification is. A process. But when we believe we have eternal life.
Jesus even says you must be born of the spirit to have eternal life and that to be born of the spirit you have to believe in him (John 3)
Originally posted by Sparko View PostWhy wouldn't you want to be baptized as a conscious and voluntary confession to your congregation and to Jesus? Are you afraid of water?
and just assenting to what your parents did is not the same as YOU doing it, as Christ commands.Last edited by JonathanL; 05-24-2019, 02:39 PM.
Comment
-
Originally posted by tabibito View Postομοιωμα does not mean symbolic. But that's only Koine Greek.
Since we didn't die physically, then it is symbolic. And if you want to argue it was a spiritual death, then you have to explain why Jesus didn't die a spiritual death but a physical one. It can't be actual because it doesn't correspond 1 to 1. That is simple logic. The solution is that it is symbolic.
Comment
-
Originally posted by Chrawnus View PostIn that same passage he also says that you need to be born of water and spirit...The first to state his case seems right until another comes and cross-examines him.
Comment
-
Originally posted by Chrawnus View PostIn that same passage he also says that you need to be born of water and spirit to enter the kingdom of heaven. Faith/belief certainly has a role in the process, and God is working in a believer even before baptism (or else they wouldn't even be able to come to faith and decide that they want to be baptized), but that doesn't invalidate all the passages where it's clearly taught that baptism saves, and that our old nature is put to death in baptism.
Comment
-
That interpretation doesn't make any sense to me. The discussion that Jesus has with Nicodemus is about what is required for a man to be born again. In that case why would he even mention that being born of water is a requirement to be born again, since by your interpretation everyone already is born of water? Saying that you have to be born of water to be born again implies that there are people who aren't born of water.
Comment
widgetinstance 221 (Related Threads) skipped due to lack of content & hide_module_if_empty option.
Comment