Because dulia is a prayer myth.
No one knew about it at that time until the some heretics came along and thought it up. Heresy can take many twists, forms and turns.
The Bible never ever makes a distinction but somehow the RCC got it right. Right? No way.
Because dulia is a prayer myth.
No one knew about it at that time until the some heretics came along and thought it up.
The claim that it was devised by heretics is an assertion without proof-- or, perhaps, circular logic. Because you believe that it is heresy, you conclude anyone who believes it must be a heretic, but you do not have either the ecclesiastical authority or even sufficient Biblical support to do so.
The Bible never ever makes a distinction but somehow the RCC got it. Right? No way.
The Bible never says "Trinity," but we seem to have gotten that part right.
I have Luke 4:8 to do so. Prayer is due unto God ONLY - it doesn't have to list every created being or created thing in the universe. God alone - all else is a no no.
There is BIBLICAL proof for the Trinity. Zero biblical proof for dulia.
I have Luke 4:8 to do so. Prayer is due unto God ONLY - it doesn't have to list every created being or thing in the universe. God alone - all else is a no no.
Again, that's about latria, not dulia. You can't say on one hand that the Bible says nothing about dulia while also arguing that it condemns it. Get your story straight.
Their is BIBLICAL proof for the Trinity. Zero proof for dulia.
Where does the Bible explicitly distinguish between trinitarianism and polytheism? If it doesn't make the distinction, it must be because trinitarianism was devised by heretics. Gosh, foud, your version of logic is fun.
Comment