Originally posted by hansgeorg
View Post
Announcement
Collapse
Admissions Forum Guidelines
Welcome to the TheologyWeb Community. Here in the Admissions Dept. we welcome all the newcomers. This section is only for welcome posts to announce the arrival of a new resident. Be sure to be welcomed or introduce yourself if our welcome committee is slacking.
Forum Rules: here
Wow! You made it! Here you are in the Admissions and Orientation Department of Tweb! This is where the rubber first hits the road; where the pedal first hits the metal; where the nuts come out of the woodwork to make sure you feel at home here.
The Admissions area is only for welcome posts to announce the arrival of a new inmate resident, and we encourage you to leave here and head out into the great big wide world of Tweb as soon as you feel comfortable in your new username.
Be sure to reply to your welcome thread, or introduce yourself if our welcome committee is out to lunch or painting their living room.
Forum Rules: here
Wow! You made it! Here you are in the Admissions and Orientation Department of Tweb! This is where the rubber first hits the road; where the pedal first hits the metal; where the nuts come out of the woodwork to make sure you feel at home here.
The Admissions area is only for welcome posts to announce the arrival of a new inmate resident, and we encourage you to leave here and head out into the great big wide world of Tweb as soon as you feel comfortable in your new username.
Be sure to reply to your welcome thread, or introduce yourself if our welcome committee is out to lunch or painting their living room.
See more
See less
JPHolding considers me a nut - that is why I am here
Collapse
X
-
If you are a stockholder, you should be used to them?http://notontimsblogroundhere.blogspot.fr/p/apologetics-section.html
Thanks, Sparko, for telling how I add the link here!
Comment
-
Originally posted by hansgeorg View PostIf you are a stockholder, you should be used to them?
I am assuming the figures you posted are pageviews for your blogs or something? If so, you are way too obsessed. If they are something else, then you are probably just plain nuts because you expect us to understand what your point is without explanation.
What do stocks have to do with it?
Comment
-
Originally posted by Sparko View PostI am assuming the figures you posted are pageviews for your blogs or something? If so, you are way too obsessed.
Even if I could be slightly obsessed with my viewer stats (as I suppose you are with ups and downs of your stocks), it is not for YOU to set the limit for me. But in this context, I was answering a point, and you go ballistic.http://notontimsblogroundhere.blogspot.fr/p/apologetics-section.html
Thanks, Sparko, for telling how I add the link here!
Comment
-
Originally posted by hansgeorg View PostThey are exactly that. And since I answered a point, obsession need not be the issue.
Even if I could be slightly obsessed with my viewer stats (as I suppose you are with ups and downs of your stocks), it is not for YOU to set the limit for me. But in this context, I was answering a point, and you go ballistic.
Anyone who is so obsessed with how many people are viewing their blogs, needs to get a life. People are not hanging on your every post.
What point were you answering? You have a habit of posting an answer to someone's post but not quoting them so we have no idea who you are answering.
Comment
-
Originally posted by Sparko View PostIf your blogs are anything like this site, most of the page views come from search engine robots, visiting over and over to index the pages. At any given moment we can have 10 or more robots indexing our site.
Originally posted by Sparko View PostAnyone who is so obsessed with how many people are viewing their blogs, needs to get a life. People are not hanging on your every post.
I depend on readers.
I am very well aware people are not hanging over my EVERY post, I see that certain posts are viewed over and over again, presumably because of polemic content, mostly, but sometimes presumably too because certain people involved in somewhat shrinkish behaviour might be trying to figure me out.
Originally posted by Sparko View PostWhat point were you answering? You have a habit of posting an answer to someone's post but not quoting them so we have no idea who you are answering.
Me to Cow Poke#24 (with quote):
Originally posted by hansgeorg View PostNo prob!
If I had had a bit more sleep or coffee (preferrably sleep), I might have caught up.
Did you look at the link?
Originally posted by Cow Poke View PostNo. To be perfectly honest, I don't "get" JPH.... I'm neither a fan nor an enemy, so your problems with him are none of my concern.
Originally posted by hansgeorg View PostActually, my problems with JPH was the reason I came here, but the link was NOT about them, it was adressed to "I am not a quitter".
Will you look now?
Originally posted by Cow Poke View PostNot really interested, Hans -- I quit.
Originally posted by hansgeorg View Postha, ha ... others don't
Originally posted by hansgeorg View PostI United+States=3317=
49+1163+155+23+7+382+72+1399+8+1+4+1+9+5+8+3+11+7+ 10
II Singapore=731=
20+20+20+19+23+21+24+29+20+26+22+22+22+20+24+19+22 +19+29+23+26+21+26+19+23+27+21+24+23+19+20+23+15
III France=522=
24+2+31+141+17+108+40+32+22+23+4+7+16+9+10+14+1+5+ 12+1+2+1
IV Ukraine=421=
17+10+19+3+259+4+48+4+2+6+6+3+30+3+1+1+4+1
V Germany=191=
27+2+58+28+14+16+3+2+1+12+4+1+2+15+1+1+3+1
VI Japan=160=
67+33+60
VII UK, Canada, Australia=106
And as you can see, I quoted your post three times, since answering three different things.http://notontimsblogroundhere.blogspot.fr/p/apologetics-section.html
Thanks, Sparko, for telling how I add the link here!
Comment
-
Originally posted by hansgeorg View PostIt seems Sarko did:The first to state his case seems right until another comes and cross-examines him.
Comment
-
Originally posted by hansgeorg View PostI suppose they are NOT anything like this site, which rules out search engine robots visiting over and over to index pages. AND if that is no longer ruled out, that means my blogs have started to get noticed.
I am a writer.
I depend on readers.
I am very well aware people are not hanging over my EVERY post, I see that certain posts are viewed over and over again, presumably because of polemic content, mostly, but sometimes presumably too because certain people involved in somewhat shrinkish behaviour might be trying to figure me out.
When I do so, it is usually a short answer to a short post.
Me to Cow Poke#24 (with quote):
CowPoke to me#26:
Me to Cow Poke#27 (no quote, since to previous):
#28, Cow Poke to me:
#29 me to Cow Poke (no quote, since to previous):
Short essential. Backed up by some stats:
Those being top seven for last week.
And as you can see, I quoted your post three times, since answering three different things.
Comment
-
Originally posted by Sparko View PostDo you even know how to tell if a page view is from a person or a robot?
Also, a page view on blogger seems to indicate the post itself has been clicked.
I also forwarded the question to this blogger who is specialised in telling us what computer and internet related features of the platform as such mean or have to offer, under this post:
http://blogging.nitecruzr.net/2015/0...ficant-in.html
Originally posted by Sparko View Postright.
or because robots are visiting your page. How many comments do you get on your posts?
This one is just myself directing to next part:
http://nov9blogg9.blogspot.com/2015/...d-candles.html
Next part has a little duel:
http://nov9blogg9.blogspot.com/2015/...eocentric.html
And so has the third part:
http://nov9blogg9.blogspot.com/2015/...stance-of.html
Note, on youtube comboxes I get into comment duels very much more often, and therefore know that people agreeing with JPHolding, more Atheists than Prots, but some of those too, agree wholeheartedly or beyond with JPH's nice choice of epithete.
A reason not to consider lack of comments as necessarily denoting lack of reading. I mean, readers could be often from the networks which are into that jargon, and who would of course want to make your point realistic.
Or where I was contacted a bit more discretely on another controversial one:
http://nov9blogg9.blogspot.com/2016/...r-whoever.html
Originally posted by Sparko View Postyeah, but what does talking about quitting have to do with how many page views your blogs get? That is a bit out of nowhere.
Also, they have been growing so steadily, apart from certain surges (like US last week, or the passing surge on my German language blog which made Israel top reader all time, 8000 page views), that it looks like readers spreading the word.
On the other hand, it looks more so about readers in certain other countries than in France or Sweden, or UK, which means the ones which are there seem to be holding surges back as best they could.http://notontimsblogroundhere.blogspot.fr/p/apologetics-section.html
Thanks, Sparko, for telling how I add the link here!
Comment
-
Originally posted by hansgeorg View Post
No, I was telling him that if he quit off reading my blogs, others weren't. They have been not quitting for years.
"Fire is catching. If we burn, you burn with us!"
"I'm not going anywhere. I'm going to stay here and cause all kinds of trouble."
Katniss Everdeen
Christ our Passover has been sacrificed for us. Therefore let us keep the feast.
Comment
-
Yeah, um... I didn't look at a single one of his blogs, not even a peek. Again, it looks like he has a personal beef with JPH, in which I have no part.
I think he takes himself far too seriously.
That being said, I quit!The first to state his case seems right until another comes and cross-examines him.
Comment
-
Originally posted by Cow Poke View PostYeah, um... I didn't look at a single one of his blogs, not even a peek. Again, it looks like he has a personal beef with JPH, in which I have no part.
I think he takes himself far too seriously.
That being said, I quit!
"Fire is catching. If we burn, you burn with us!"
"I'm not going anywhere. I'm going to stay here and cause all kinds of trouble."
Katniss Everdeen
Christ our Passover has been sacrificed for us. Therefore let us keep the feast.
Comment
-
Yes, but taking a joke literally is my take on a good joke. At least it makes me smirk!
And, as said, some guys seem to have begun and not quit reading me. Not sure its mostly the best readers I could wish for, but some have.http://notontimsblogroundhere.blogspot.fr/p/apologetics-section.html
Thanks, Sparko, for telling how I add the link here!
Comment
-
Originally posted by hansgeorg View PostAnd, as said, some guys seem to have begun and not quit reading me.
Originally posted by hansgeorg View PostNot sure its mostly the best readers I could wish for, but some have.
"Fire is catching. If we burn, you burn with us!"
"I'm not going anywhere. I'm going to stay here and cause all kinds of trouble."
Katniss Everdeen
Christ our Passover has been sacrificed for us. Therefore let us keep the feast.
Comment
-
Just so you know, you are not allowed to link to your personal blogs or sites in your posts. You can put links in your signature block, but constantly linking them in your posts is against our rules. You seem to do it a lot, so if you are here to try to hijack our search engine rankings to get more pageviews for your site, you can forget about it.
Comment
Comment