Originally posted by Mountain Man
View Post
Alternative facts are simply those facts that the liberal deliberately suppresses because they don't fit the narrative.
Originally posted by rogue06
View Post
Alternative facts is legitimate although a clumsy phrase. They are the sort of things that one side might leave out to paint a false picture.
For instance, if I were to say that A threatened to kill B, that A owns a firearm of the same caliber used to kill B and that witnesses say someone of A's size and build was seen running away right after the gun shot, I paint a pretty damning picture of A being guilty of killing B.
But if I left out the "alternative facts" that A was was a thousand miles away where dozens of people saw and spoke with him at the time of the shooting we suddenly have a very different picture.
Now you can still believe that the truth is that A shot B regardless of the evidence but you would be choosing your truth over the facts.
For instance, if I were to say that A threatened to kill B, that A owns a firearm of the same caliber used to kill B and that witnesses say someone of A's size and build was seen running away right after the gun shot, I paint a pretty damning picture of A being guilty of killing B.
But if I left out the "alternative facts" that A was was a thousand miles away where dozens of people saw and spoke with him at the time of the shooting we suddenly have a very different picture.
Now you can still believe that the truth is that A shot B regardless of the evidence but you would be choosing your truth over the facts.
Comment