Announcement

Collapse

Civics 101 Guidelines

Want to argue about politics? Healthcare reform? Taxes? Governments? You've come to the right place!

Try to keep it civil though. The rules still apply here.
See more
See less

Police guns down man after he tried to flee.

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • Originally posted by myth View Post
    You are aware that correlation is not causation, correct?
    That's correct - but since we were talking about evidence rather than causation, this appears to not be particularly relevant.

    Originally posted by myth View Post
    There is scant evidence of racist trends in law enforcement (recently)
    Why should we be only limited to "recent" evidence? That doesn't seem like a reasonable restriction for the purposes of this conversation...

    Comment


    • Originally posted by Whateverman View Post
      That's correct - but since we were talking about evidence rather than causation, this appears to not be particularly relevant.


      Why should we be only limited to "recent" evidence? That doesn't seem like a reasonable restriction for the purposes of this conversation...
      By correlation and causation, I meant the overall discussion regarding arrest rates and sentencing, etc. Sorry, I probably should have remained more narrowly focused on the issue at hand.

      But sure, since we're talking about evidence - do you have any to present? Pick a police shooting of an African American in the last 5 years and present the evidence that racism was the cause.

      And I noticed you haven't answered my questions about proportional race assumptions.

      Regarding recency....if you're trying to make the argument that the criminal justice system is CURRENTLY systemically racist (I'm assuming you are, feel free to correct me. And if that's the case, I'll be glad you agree that the system isn't racist), then you'll need to present current evidence. Talking about what happened in the 1970s can be fascinating from a historical perspective, but it doesn't tell you anything about a criminal justice system today which is staffed by people who weren't working (and indeed, many who weren't even born) then.
      "If you believe, take the first step, it leads to Jesus Christ. If you don't believe, take the first step all the same, for you are bidden to take it. No one wants to know about your faith or unbelief, your orders are to perform the act of obedience on the spot. Then you will find yourself in the situation where faith becomes possible and where faith exists in the true sense of the word." - Dietrich Bonhoeffer, The Cost of Discipleship

      Comment


      • Originally posted by myth View Post
        Oh my, I'm really waiting for this one. The very first test the officer did was the Horizontal Gaze Nystagmus test. That body cam video is not good enough or angled correctly to see if he passed that test or not. The HGN is probably the most accurate of the field sobriety tests, and it's not uncommon to arrest based mostly (not entirely) on that one test if the subject has leg/mobility problems and cannot complete the other tests. I'm certified to do the HGN test, and I'm telling you the only person who was close enough to see those test results was the officer doing the test....
        We have a "Citizens Police Academy" where one of the 14 week classes is on drugs and alcohol. We actually have volunteers drink to varying degrees - one will consume a beer, another 3 beers, another 6 beers, and the candidates are taught how to assess "drunkenness" with the HGN and other observations. I'm always impressed that they hit it pretty spot on!
        The first to state his case seems right until another comes and cross-examines him.

        Comment


        • Originally posted by Cow Poke View Post
          We have a "Citizens Police Academy" where one of the 14 week classes is on drugs and alcohol. We actually have volunteers drink to varying degrees - one will consume a beer, another 3 beers, another 6 beers, and the candidates are taught how to assess "drunkenness" with the HGN and other observations. I'm always impressed that they hit it pretty spot on!
          Some of the larger studies suggest the HGN is between 77-88% accurate (as in, correct arrest decision based on minimum .08 BAC reading) by itself. Adding the other standard tests increases the arrest decision accuracy to about 95%. Granted, that assumes proper training and execution of the techniques. That's a 95% decision accuracy without using a preliminary breath testing device. And honestly, a ton of DWI arrests these days involve more than one substance, so the breath test isn't all that helpful anyways. If they're popping ladder bars and had a few beers, the breath test may show .04 BAC but they may be so hammered they can barely stand up. After completing ARIDE and getting a better understanding of non-alcohol drug impairment, I started doing blood draws more frequently. Using the Intox doesn't help prove impairment if a significant factor is a drug that doesn't show up in the breath test. But when you get that blood back and they've got 2-5 different impairing substances in their blood stream, it's easier to prove.
          "If you believe, take the first step, it leads to Jesus Christ. If you don't believe, take the first step all the same, for you are bidden to take it. No one wants to know about your faith or unbelief, your orders are to perform the act of obedience on the spot. Then you will find yourself in the situation where faith becomes possible and where faith exists in the true sense of the word." - Dietrich Bonhoeffer, The Cost of Discipleship

          Comment


          • Originally posted by myth View Post
            Some of the larger studies suggest the HGN is between 77-88% accurate (as in, correct arrest decision based on minimum .08 BAC reading) by itself. Adding the other standard tests increases the arrest decision accuracy to about 95%. Granted, that assumes proper training and execution of the techniques. That's a 95% decision accuracy without using a preliminary breath testing device. And honestly, a ton of DWI arrests these days involve more than one substance, so the breath test isn't all that helpful anyways. If they're popping ladder bars and had a few beers, the breath test may show .04 BAC but they may be so hammered they can barely stand up. After completing ARIDE and getting a better understanding of non-alcohol drug impairment, I started doing blood draws more frequently. Using the Intox doesn't help prove impairment if a significant factor is a drug that doesn't show up in the breath test. But when you get that blood back and they've got 2-5 different impairing substances in their blood stream, it's easier to prove.
            OK, mind you my service was DECADES ago, but I was, indeed, a licensed breathalyzer operator. We were trained that the breath test (BAC) was only corroborative. That the officer made the arrest based on his observation, field sobriety, driver's performance (drifting lanes, driving too slowly, overcompensating for oncoming traffic, etc), and the "0.08" was not, in and of itself, a critical factor. But, again, that was AGES ago.
            The first to state his case seems right until another comes and cross-examines him.

            Comment


            • Originally posted by myth View Post
              Some of the larger studies suggest the HGN is between 77-88% accurate (as in, correct arrest decision based on minimum .08 BAC reading) by itself. Adding the other standard tests increases the arrest decision accuracy to about 95%. Granted, that assumes proper training and execution of the techniques. That's a 95% decision accuracy without using a preliminary breath testing device. And honestly, a ton of DWI arrests these days involve more than one substance, so the breath test isn't all that helpful anyways. If they're popping ladder bars and had a few beers, the breath test may show .04 BAC but they may be so hammered they can barely stand up. After completing ARIDE and getting a better understanding of non-alcohol drug impairment, I started doing blood draws more frequently. Using the Intox doesn't help prove impairment if a significant factor is a drug that doesn't show up in the breath test. But when you get that blood back and they've got 2-5 different impairing substances in their blood stream, it's easier to prove.
              "Ladder bars"? I'm not familiar with that term.
              Some may call me foolish, and some may call me odd
              But I'd rather be a fool in the eyes of man
              Than a fool in the eyes of God


              From "Fools Gold" by Petra

              Comment


              • Originally posted by Mountain Man View Post
                "Ladder bars"? I'm not familiar with that term.
                Xanax. Also known as Xanbars.
                "What has the Church gained if it is popular, but there is no conviction, no repentance, no power?" - A.W. Tozer

                "... there are two parties in Washington, the stupid party and the evil party, who occasionally get together and do something both stupid and evil, and this is called bipartisanship." - Everett Dirksen

                Comment


                • And once again the thread is focused on what the man shot in the back without just cause was doing wrong and not the policeman that shot him and who is now charged with felony murder along with 10 other charges.

                  I guess the fact he yelled 'I got him' and that the officer ran over and kicked brooks as he lay bleeding out and the fact both officers refused to render any medical aid is ok?
                  Last edited by oxmixmudd; 06-18-2020, 12:26 AM.
                  My brethren, do not hold your faith in our glorious Lord Jesus Christ with an attitude of personal favoritism. James 2:1

                  If anyone thinks himself to be religious, and yet does not  bridle his tongue but deceives his own heart, this man’s religion is worthless James 1:26

                  This you know, my beloved brethren. But everyone must be quick to hear, slow to speak and slow to anger; James 1:19

                  Comment


                  • Originally posted by oxmixmudd View Post
                    And once again the thread is focused on what the man shot in the back without just cause was doing wrong and not the policeman that shot him and who is now charged with felony murder along with 10 other charges.

                    I guess the fact he yelled 'I got him' and that the officer ran over and kicked brooks as he lay bleeding out and the fact both officers refused to render any medical aid is ok?

                    It's like you're immune to anything that doesn't fit your prejudices. Honestly, you make it harder to believe anything but that this was a justified shooting, since you're so biased.

                    Just scream and yell and point at the 'bad people' who are talking about what actually happened, don't bother to address anything they say...

                    AFAIK Myth is or was a LEO, and he made a number of substantial points in the last few pages, in response to your previous post, and others. But hey, no need to address any of that, just keep emotively yelling at people. No need to drag this out for pages and pages....


                    Can we just cut to the part where you lose it and start accusing people of being racist, speaking on behalf of demons and all that?
                    ...>>> Witty remark or snarky quote of another poster goes here <<<...

                    Comment


                    • Originally posted by Cow Poke View Post
                      OK, mind you my service was DECADES ago, but I was, indeed, a licensed breathalyzer operator. We were trained that the breath test (BAC) was only corroborative. That the officer made the arrest based on his observation, field sobriety, driver's performance (drifting lanes, driving too slowly, overcompensating for oncoming traffic, etc), and the "0.08" was not, in and of itself, a critical factor. But, again, that was AGES ago.
                      Interesting. I've been told by both police and lawyers that the field sobriety tests are a joke but serve the purpose of allowing the officer to observe the suspect for several minutes so that he couldn't later claim that he belched before taking the breath test which can result in a higher level of alcohol in the breath and therefore a false higher reading.

                      I'm always still in trouble again

                      "You're by far the worst poster on TWeb" and "TWeb's biggest liar" --starlight (the guy who says Stalin was a right-winger)
                      "Overall I would rate the withdrawal from Afghanistan as by far the best thing Biden's done" --Starlight
                      "Of course, human life begins at fertilization that’s not the argument." --Tassman

                      Comment


                      • There are suggestions that police in Atlanta are walking off the job now.

                        https://twitter.com/SteveDeaceShow/s...76039155179525

                        Police department is denying a complete walkout.

                        https://twitter.com/Atlanta_Police/s...15926872969216

                        Earlier suggestions that multiple officers from each zone had walked off the job were inaccurate. The department is experiencing a higher than usual number of call outs with the incoming shift. We have enough resources to maintain operations & remain able to respond to incidents.

                        Comment


                        • Originally posted by oxmixmudd View Post
                          And once again the thread is focused on what the man shot in the back without just cause was doing wrong and not the policeman that shot him and who is now charged with felony murder along with 10 other charges.

                          I guess the fact he yelled 'I got him' and that the officer ran over and kicked brooks as he lay bleeding out and the fact both officers refused to render any medical aid is ok?
                          Spinning around and aiming a weapon at an officer is now not just cause? Lord help us.

                          I'm always still in trouble again

                          "You're by far the worst poster on TWeb" and "TWeb's biggest liar" --starlight (the guy who says Stalin was a right-winger)
                          "Overall I would rate the withdrawal from Afghanistan as by far the best thing Biden's done" --Starlight
                          "Of course, human life begins at fertilization that’s not the argument." --Tassman

                          Comment


                          • Originally posted by Darth Ovious View Post
                            There are suggestions that police in Atlanta are walking off the job now.

                            https://twitter.com/SteveDeaceShow/s...76039155179525



                            Police department is denying a complete walkout.

                            https://twitter.com/Atlanta_Police/s...15926872969216
                            I noted earlier how Atlanta has been facing a severe police shortage for awhile now and this has definitely opened the flood gates for an exodus. Still, there won't be a "complete walkout" since those who are close to retirement and their pension will likely tough it out.

                            I'm always still in trouble again

                            "You're by far the worst poster on TWeb" and "TWeb's biggest liar" --starlight (the guy who says Stalin was a right-winger)
                            "Overall I would rate the withdrawal from Afghanistan as by far the best thing Biden's done" --Starlight
                            "Of course, human life begins at fertilization that’s not the argument." --Tassman

                            Comment


                            • https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/art...-gave-CPR.html

                              Amid angry shouts and accusations from by-standers Rolfe can be clearly heard pleading, 'Mr. Brooks keep breathing. Keep breathing for me.'

                              The jerky bodycam footage captures him kneeling on the ground and administering CPR to the bleeding man while Brosnan looks on.

                              Rolfe administered CPR until the ambulance arrived and can be heard repeatedly calling Mr. Brooks' name as he tried to keep him alive.
                              Looks like the officer actually gave CPR to try and save the man's life and he can heard pleading for him to keep breathing and not to die.

                              Comment


                              • Originally posted by Darth Ovious View Post
                                https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/art...-gave-CPR.html



                                Looks like the officer actually gave CPR to try and save the man's life and he can heard pleading for him to keep breathing and not to die.
                                So the DA with his 11 charges is obviously talking out of his backside when he accused the officer of not administering timely aid.

                                Some may call me foolish, and some may call me odd
                                But I'd rather be a fool in the eyes of man
                                Than a fool in the eyes of God


                                From "Fools Gold" by Petra

                                Comment

                                Related Threads

                                Collapse

                                Topics Statistics Last Post
                                Started by Cow Poke, Today, 09:15 AM
                                3 responses
                                29 views
                                0 likes
                                Last Post rogue06
                                by rogue06
                                 
                                Started by CivilDiscourse, Yesterday, 04:11 PM
                                13 responses
                                79 views
                                0 likes
                                Last Post CivilDiscourse  
                                Started by seer, Yesterday, 03:50 PM
                                2 responses
                                45 views
                                0 likes
                                Last Post seer
                                by seer
                                 
                                Started by Hypatia_Alexandria, Yesterday, 05:08 AM
                                3 responses
                                25 views
                                0 likes
                                Last Post Hypatia_Alexandria  
                                Started by Hypatia_Alexandria, Yesterday, 04:58 AM
                                17 responses
                                69 views
                                0 likes
                                Last Post Hypatia_Alexandria  
                                Working...
                                X