Announcement
Collapse
Civics 101 Guidelines
Want to argue about politics? Healthcare reform? Taxes? Governments? You've come to the right place!
Try to keep it civil though. The rules still apply here.
Try to keep it civil though. The rules still apply here.
See more
See less
Now the WHO wants to take our sick kids and other sick people right out of our homes
Collapse
X
-
If I thought I had it I would seriously consider not even going to the doctor to avoid the government finding out that I had it at this point in time."I am not angered that the Moral Majority boys campaign against abortion. I am angry when the same men who say, "Save OUR children" bellow "Build more and bigger bombers." That's right! Blast the children in other nations into eternity, or limbless misery as they lay crippled from "OUR" bombers! This does not jell." - Leonard Ravenhill
-
Originally posted by Juvenal View PostAllow me to suggest that taking Rebel News reporting at face value is not likely to prove a sensible decision when the context they remove has been filled in.
Comment
-
Hm....Trump had said he might pull U.S. funding out of the WHO. He just might get my support on that.Watch your links! http://www.theologyweb.com/campus/fa...corumetiquette
Comment
-
Originally posted by mossrose View PostHas anybody heard anything about this from the MSM?
https://www.foxnews.com/opinion/tuck...ne-were-on-now
Dr. Michael Ryan, executive director of the WHO Health Emergencies Programme: In most parts of the world, due to lockdown, most of the transmission that's actually happening in many countries now is happening in the household at family level.
In some senses, transmission has been taken off the streets and pushed back into family units.
Now, we need to go and look in families to find those people who may be sick and remove them and isolate them in a safe and dignified manner.
Securely anchored to the Rock amid every storm of trial, testing or tribulation.
Comment
-
Originally posted by DesertBerean View PostHm....Trump had said he might pull U.S. funding out of the WHO. He just might get my support on that.
Comment
-
Originally posted by seanD View Post"It's taken out of context" is used probably because what is being suggested by a "reputable health organization" is so radical. I do wish the channel linked to the original video in the description, but we heard him say it, albeit he said it in a "nice" way. The only argument to be made is if he was using a hypothetical or it was some sort of simulated scenario, but even suggesting it is repulsive, though I'm guessing he's referring to defenseless third world countries or countries more authoritarian like China."I am not angered that the Moral Majority boys campaign against abortion. I am angry when the same men who say, "Save OUR children" bellow "Build more and bigger bombers." That's right! Blast the children in other nations into eternity, or limbless misery as they lay crippled from "OUR" bombers! This does not jell." - Leonard Ravenhill
Comment
-
Originally posted by Juvenal View PostReally, folks, how would this even work? WHO employs doctors and nurses. Are they going to force kids out of their homes at the point of a stethoscope?Some may call me foolish, and some may call me odd
But I'd rather be a fool in the eyes of man
Than a fool in the eyes of God
From "Fools Gold" by Petra
Comment
-
Here's the full 65 minute video of the press conference (from the WHO's official YouTube account) if anybody feels like digging through it.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=2v3v...ture=emb_title
Citing Tucker Carlson in itself doesn't add any actual context because he's just an opinion journalist who linked to the video and provided his opinion. However, he is the one who called attention to the story."I am not angered that the Moral Majority boys campaign against abortion. I am angry when the same men who say, "Save OUR children" bellow "Build more and bigger bombers." That's right! Blast the children in other nations into eternity, or limbless misery as they lay crippled from "OUR" bombers! This does not jell." - Leonard Ravenhill
Comment
-
Originally posted by mossrose View PostHere's from Fox, which will be pooh-poohed by the left here.
https://www.foxnews.com/opinion/tuck...ne-were-on-now
I don't have time right now to look for any more. Maybe somebody on the left can find something to refute this.
Comment
Related Threads
Collapse
Topics | Statistics | Last Post | ||
---|---|---|---|---|
Started by CivilDiscourse, Today, 03:45 PM
|
13 responses
49 views
2 likes
|
Last Post
by Mountain Man
Today, 08:52 PM
|
||
Started by Sparko, Today, 03:19 PM
|
20 responses
67 views
0 likes
|
Last Post
by Ronson
Today, 09:21 PM
|
||
Started by seer, Today, 07:58 AM
|
26 responses
134 views
0 likes
|
Last Post
by rogue06
Today, 06:24 PM
|
||
Started by seanD, 07-01-2024, 01:20 PM
|
45 responses
236 views
0 likes
|
Last Post
by seanD
Today, 09:29 PM
|
||
Started by seer, 07-01-2024, 09:42 AM
|
169 responses
875 views
0 likes
|
Last Post
by seer
Today, 06:19 AM
|
Comment