Originally posted by rogue06
View Post
Announcement
Collapse
Civics 101 Guidelines
Want to argue about politics? Healthcare reform? Taxes? Governments? You've come to the right place!
Try to keep it civil though. The rules still apply here.
Try to keep it civil though. The rules still apply here.
See more
See less
Evangelicals full of fear
Collapse
X
-
-
Originally posted by Charles View PostHe is a Christian and an evangelical....The first to state his case seems right until another comes and cross-examines him.
Comment
-
Other interesting takes on how American evangelical history is guided by fear:
https://www.vox.com/2018/11/5/180594...alism-john-fea
Comment
-
Originally posted by Charles View PostOther interesting takes on how American evangelical history is guided by fear:...
Next?The first to state his case seems right until another comes and cross-examines him.
Comment
-
Originally posted by rogue06 View PostYou mean like the collusion delusion?
I'm talking about the continued idiocy that surrounds the idea that COVID 19 is being over-hyped to make trump look bad, or to lose him the election, or as part of the ever present one world order/mark of the beast etc.
I'm talking about those Christians that are given over to the anti-vax psseudo-science garbage carrying on about the covid19 vaccine.
And of course the continued endless list of conspiracy theories and pseudo-scientific iinanity that surrounds the Global Warning issue.
To name but a few.
It is today as it was when Augustine wrote of those Christians intent on perpetuating ignorance in his day:
Now all I'm saying is the same thing. The problem is this sort of thing is pervasive, almost the dominant form of thought in conservative evangelical circles. And that is why I call it out.
Of course, we don't find many of you accusing Augustine of throwing the ignorant Christians of his day under the Bus by calling out their ignorance. Such is the nature of hindsight I suppose.Last edited by oxmixmudd; 04-07-2020, 09:33 AM.My brethren, do not hold your faith in our glorious Lord Jesus Christ with an attitude of personal favoritism. James 2:1
If anyone thinks himself to be religious, and yet does not bridle his tongue but deceives his own heart, this man’s religion is worthless James 1:26
This you know, my beloved brethren. But everyone must be quick to hear, slow to speak and slow to anger; James 1:19
Comment
-
Originally posted by Chuckles View PostBy your own logic you are shoving your own fellow Christian, Ox, underneath the bus and you have done so repeatedly. But, once again, it seems you have no problem with double standards.
And, you may have noticed the part I qoted in the opening post was promoting Christian values and ways of life and only challenged whether people acted accordingly. But, it seems, family separation and hostility towards the stranger is so integral to your identity that you feel it challenges your faith if anyone says it is wrong even if it is a "fellow Christian". And where was your support for the "assumption" he was pro homosexual practice. Do you have anything to support it?
"No Christian would ever support the policies of President Trump."
"I'm a Christian, and I support the policies of President Trump."
"Well then, no true Christian would ever support the policies of President Trump."
As for whether or not Fea supports homosexuality, the article you cited only vaguely referred to "some kind of change in the culture" without elaborating, and since "sexual fluidity" has been, I think, the biggest cultural change in the last few decades, I made a reasoned assumption. But let's put that assumption to the side. Fea's premise is that Christians should necessarily be willing to generally accept "some kind of change in the culture", and I reject that premise. There are certainly cultural changes that we absolutely should NOT accept, and not accepting them does not mean we are fearful and not "true Christians".
As for John Fea himself, I can't seem to find much about him other than that his claim to fame is that he identifies as a Christian and wrote a book critical of other Christians who support Trump, which has naturally made him a darling of the liberal media who gleefully quotes in their Trump/Christian bashing articles. I did come across one article, however, in which Fea was apparently dismissive of those Christians who condemned Pete Buttigieg's homosexuality, saying that it was "much ado about nothing" because Christians weren't going to vote for a Democrat anyway. What a curious standard.Some may call me foolish, and some may call me odd
But I'd rather be a fool in the eyes of man
Than a fool in the eyes of God
From "Fools Gold" by Petra
Comment
-
Originally posted by Charles View PostOther interesting takes on how American evangelical history is guided by fear:
https://www.vox.com/2018/11/5/180594...alism-john-fea
Some may call me foolish, and some may call me odd
But I'd rather be a fool in the eyes of man
Than a fool in the eyes of God
From "Fools Gold" by Petra
Comment
-
Originally posted by Mountain Man View PostNope... I've never talked about Democrats in the nasty, judgmental, mean-spirited way ox talks about his President, and I have never questioned whether or not someone was a "true ChristianTM" just because they supported Obama, or voted for Hillary. And that's really what the OP is, a "no true Christian fallacy".
"No Christian would ever support the policies of President Trump."
"I'm a Christian, and I support the policies of President Trump."
"Well then, no true Christian would ever support the policies of President Trump."
As for whether or not Fea supports homosexuality, the article you cited only vaguely referred to "some kind of change in the culture" without elaborating, and since "sexual fluidity" has been, I think, the biggest cultural change in the last few decades, I made a reasoned assumption. But let's put that assumption to the side. Fea's premise is that Christians should necessarily be willing to generally accept "some kind of change in the culture", and I reject that premise. There are certainly cultural changes that we absolutely should NOT accept, and not accepting them does not mean we are fearful and not "true Christians".
As for John Fea himself, I can't seem to find much about him other than that his claim to fame is that he identifies as a Christian and wrote a book critical of other Christians who support Trump, which has naturally made him a darling of the liberal media who gleefully quotes in their Trump/Christian bashing articles. I did come across one article, however, in which Fea was apparently dismissive of those Christians who condemned Pete Buttigieg's homosexuality, saying that it was "much ado about nothing" because Christians weren't going to vote for a Democrat anyway. What a curious standard.The first to state his case seems right until another comes and cross-examines him.
Comment
-
Originally posted by Mountain Man View PostNope... I've never talked about Democrats in the nasty, judgmental, mean-spirited way ox talks about his President, and I have never questioned whether or not someone was a "true ChristianTM" just because they supported Obama, or voted for Hillary. And that's really what the OP is, a "no true Christian fallacy".
[...]
Comment
-
Originally posted by oxmixmudd View PostOf course, we don't find many of you accusing Augustine of throwing the ignorant Christians of his day under the Bus by calling out their ignorance. Such is the nature of hindsight I suppose.Some may call me foolish, and some may call me odd
But I'd rather be a fool in the eyes of man
Than a fool in the eyes of God
From "Fools Gold" by Petra
Comment
-
Originally posted by Cow Poke View PostDoesn't sound much like an Evangelical, eh?
In my language we don't use capital letters at all when describing a persons religion, so we would write "christian" instead of "Christian". I thought in English one would generally use capital letters in all cases. I would be happy to correct the error in the opening post and elsewhere but I cannot.
You will see the error two times in the opening post: "Messiah College historian John Fea, himself an Evangelical, has some rather interesting observations and thoughts about Evangelicals." His observations and thoughts are obviously about "evangelicals".
You seem to use almost all posts in here to repeat your pointing to an error I have admitted and had no intention of making.Last edited by Charles; 04-07-2020, 10:18 AM.
Comment
-
Originally posted by Mountain Man View PostIf I didn't know any better, I would think a fear of change was a human quality and not something unique to evangelicals.
Here is a part of what I quoted Fea saying in the opening post:"Fear represents a kind of lack of faith in God's sovereignty or God's will to work out his purposes. I love the quote from Marylinne Robinson: 'Fear is not a Christian habit of mind.' Fear is a product of the broken world that we live in, but fear is not a place where one can dwell and still claim to be an evangelical Christian. It produces negative consequences.
Comment
-
Originally posted by Charles View PostI don't see anyone challenging the idea that fear of change is a human quality. The point rather seems to be that the Christian message should take away that fear and should cause human beings to not be guided by their fear. Mossrose wrote about this in one of the first posts: http://www.theologyweb.com/campus/sh...l=1#post725940
Here is a part of what I quoted Fea saying in the opening post:
This is one of the reasons I just tuned out all the end-times eschatological musings long ago. It's all fear mongering and paranoia. And that element is one of the seeds that produces so many of the crazy ideas we see coming out of Evangelical Christendom. Evangelicals steeped in these end times prognostications are always on the paranoid look out for any and all possible indications the end has come - obscuring and hindering their focus on trusting God and helping those in need now. They often see every action towards peace in the world as a move towards the manifestation of the false prophet of peace and the anti-Christ ushering in the Tribulation. And in the end it undercuts the Gospel message. They see conspiracies everywhere. The Illuminati, the one world order, and so on and so on. I used to follow it. But I fairly early on realized this is not what God wants from us. He wants us to trust him and BE salt and light in the world, to BE the church and to help people find the peace, grace and redemption that come from knowing Christ. Living open,vulnerable,loving lives. Not murmuring among ourselves wondering if the latest id card or global initiative is paving the way for the anti-Christ.Last edited by oxmixmudd; 04-07-2020, 10:54 AM.My brethren, do not hold your faith in our glorious Lord Jesus Christ with an attitude of personal favoritism. James 2:1
If anyone thinks himself to be religious, and yet does not bridle his tongue but deceives his own heart, this man’s religion is worthless James 1:26
This you know, my beloved brethren. But everyone must be quick to hear, slow to speak and slow to anger; James 1:19
Comment
-
Originally posted by oxmixmudd View PostNot so much take it away as give us the strength and determination not to act on it, and the wisdom to recognize it. Yet in so many places, and on so many web pages, much of the opposite rings out.
This is one of the reasons I just tuned out all the end-times eschatological musings long ago. It's all fear mongering and paranoia. And that element is one of the seeds that produces so many of the crazy ideas we see coming out of Evangelical Christendom. Evangelicals steeped in these end times prognostications are always on the paranoid look out for any and all possible indications the end has come - obscuring and hindering their focus on trusting God and helping those in need now. They often see every action towards peace in the world as a move towards the manifestation of the false prophet of peace and the anti-Christ ushering in the Tribulation. And in the end it undercuts the Gospel message. They see conspiracies everywhere. The Illuminati, the one world order, and so on and so on. I used to follow it. But I finally realized this is not what God wants from us. He wants us to trust him and BE salt and light in the world, to BE the church and to help people find the peace, grace and redemption that come from knowing Christ. Living open,vulnerable,loving lives. Not murmuring among ourselves wondering if the latest id card or global initiative is paving the way for the anti-Christ.
Comment
-
Originally posted by seanD View PostNot much different than the gloom and doom scientific prophets you uphold, and they have much more impact and influence on the world than the evangelicals you detest. How many children have been frightened to the point of emotional hysterics because they believe the world is doomed in a decade? Those are the folks you choose to honor.Some may call me foolish, and some may call me odd
But I'd rather be a fool in the eyes of man
Than a fool in the eyes of God
From "Fools Gold" by Petra
Comment
Related Threads
Collapse
Topics | Statistics | Last Post | ||
---|---|---|---|---|
Started by Cow Poke, Yesterday, 06:29 AM
|
32 responses
169 views
0 likes
|
Last Post
by Cow Poke
Yesterday, 07:40 PM
|
||
Started by carpedm9587, 06-16-2024, 08:13 PM
|
13 responses
80 views
0 likes
|
Last Post
by JimL
Yesterday, 10:31 PM
|
||
Started by eider, 06-16-2024, 12:12 AM
|
29 responses
157 views
0 likes
|
Last Post
by eider
Today, 12:09 AM
|
||
Started by Cow Poke, 06-15-2024, 12:53 PM
|
52 responses
273 views
0 likes
|
Last Post
by Cow Poke
Yesterday, 11:27 AM
|
||
Started by Diogenes, 06-14-2024, 08:57 PM
|
112 responses
512 views
0 likes
|
Last Post
by eider
Today, 12:32 AM
|
Comment