Originally posted by shunyadragon
View Post
Since he likes to falsely accuse me of supposedly altering the meaning of something he said by taking it out of context, here is the entire paragraph:
I have no clue how the database on which all of this functions is managed maintained, and what its degree of detail is. Does it include patient IDs, infection start/end dates? Or are they simply aggregating numbers from multiple sources and depending on the sources for accuracy. I suspect the latter.
Again I say, exactly my point.
So when I ask, "How many people in the US are actually sick with the Wuhan flu at this exact moment?" the answer is "Based on the data, we think it could be X, but we really don't know."
Why are you guys so unwilling to acknowledge the uncertainty? I have my suspicions why (treating science as if it is a source of absolute truth) but that's a topic for another day.
Comment