All right, demi will lend a hand.
The difference which the wormtongue omits is that Pam Bondi being a foreign agent does not create any money flow to Trump or benefit Trump in any perceptible way, whereas Burisma paying Hunter* creates a potential money flow to Joe Biden, who had great influence over Ukraine policy**. Ergo, the prima facie case of Joe Biden being corrupt is plausible, with either himself or his son benefiting, and this has to be investigated.
Anything else?
Rule for this thread: any disputed factual claim needs to be backed by the usual Tweb standards: weblink + substantive summary/quoting. (*undisputed, ** also undisputed). Any poster violating this rule too many times will be asked to leave the thread
There are too many unsubstantiated claims in other threads on this issue, and useful discussion is almost impossible.
Originally posted by Sam
View Post
Anything else?
Rule for this thread: any disputed factual claim needs to be backed by the usual Tweb standards: weblink + substantive summary/quoting. (*undisputed, ** also undisputed). Any poster violating this rule too many times will be asked to leave the thread
There are too many unsubstantiated claims in other threads on this issue, and useful discussion is almost impossible.
Comment