Little Greta comes clean

[oxmixmudd]

And yet....

And yet ... I am still here making my case am I not?

I dont pick fights with the people I work with. And so far, they dont pick fights with me. And that is a good thing. I dont hide who I am or what I believe, but neither do I force my beliefs on anyone that has not asked what they are.

And as for a workplace environment, that is as it should be.

I have not been 'bullied into silence' by you or anyone else.

[Abigail]

It is when the government forces, you by penalty of law, as I linked. And I find it offense having to lie by referring to a man as a women.

There are way too many laws. Just stick to referring to the person by their name. If they are not satisfied with that and persist on boxing you into a position where you have to use a gender pronoun then I would argue they are the aggressor.

[lilpixieofterror]

And yet ... I am still here making my case am I not?

I dont pick fights with the people I work with. And so far, they dont pick fights with me. And that is a good thing. I dont hide who I am or what I believe, but neither do I force my beliefs on anyone that has not asked what they are.

And as for a workplace environment, that is as it should be.

[oxmixmudd]

Indeed it is pix.

Your judgement of me is so completely wrong it in fact judges you. But you'll have to wait for the final scene to know just how wrong you have been.

[Sparko]

It is not "giving up free speech" to exhibit common courtesy and avoid causing deliberate offense.

Doing it voluntarily out of politeness is fine. Doing it because you are afraid of being sued or losing your job is quite another thing.

[oxmixmudd]

You dont really understand the point I was making pix. But I also know from experience you have no interest in understanding why that is the case.

[oxmixmudd]

Doing it voluntarily out of politeness is fine. Doing it because you are afraid of being sued or losing your job is quite another thing.

I'm not going to violate company policy so I can insult another person. Nor am I going to risk my employment for the same reason. It is irresponsible to put your family at risk for so petty a reason. And both you and pix are only judging yourselves by trying to paint me as a coward. I have never backed down from speaking the truth when asked. And the two of you are right now walking into your own judgement over the tack you are taking in this thread. God knows who I am, and the false accusations and insinuations you are raising here will be amongst the chaff that is burned at judgement in your names.

[lilpixieofterror]

You dont really understand the point I was making pix. But I also know from experience you have no interest in understanding why that is the case.

[lilpixieofterror]

I'm not going to violate company policy so I can insult another person. Nor am I going to risk my employment for the same reason. It is irresponsible to put your family at risk for so petty a reason. And both you and pix are only judging yourselves by trying to paint me as a coward. I have never backed down from speaking the truth when asked. And the two of you are right now walking into your own judgement over the tack you are taking in this thread. God knows who I am, and the false accusations and insinuations you are raising here will be amongst the chaff that is burned at judgement in your names.

[Sparko]

I'm not going to violate company policy so I can insult another person. Nor am I going to risk my employment for the same reason. It is irresponsible to put your family at risk for so petty a reason. And both you and pix are only judging yourselves by trying to paint me as a coward. I have never backed down from speaking the truth when asked. And the two of you are right now walking into your own judgement over the tack you are taking in this thread. God knows who I am, and the false accusations and insinuations you are raising here will be amongst the chaff that is burned at judgement in your names.

What if company policy meant you had to publicly denounce your faith?

...Or you had to wear a MAGA hat?

[Tassman]

It is when the government forces, you by penalty of law, as I linked. And I find it offense having to lie by referring to a man as a women.

had

[seanD]

had

That argumentation will do wonders for you in the black community, especially if you're white (and I'm going to guess that you are one of those snooty white ivory tower liberals completely out of touch with actual blacks in the ghetto). I dare you to come down to South Central Los Angeles and make an argument of gay rights being equivalent to the civil rights movement.

[Starlight]

That argumentation will do wonders for you in the black community, especially if you're white (and I'm going to guess that you are one of those snooty white ivory tower liberals completely out of touch with actual blacks in the ghetto). I dare you to come down to South Central Los Angeles and make an argument of gay rights being equivalent to the civil rights movement.

Facts don't care about people's feelings. They can say 'waaah!' all they like and Tass would still be right.

[seanD]

Facts don't care about people's feelings.

You definitely got that right.

[seer]

had

I said nothing about equality Tass, I'm not speaking about denying them work or the vote or property rights etc... I'm talking about me or you or anyone being forced by law to refer to a man as a woman or visa versa under the threat of penalty (in other words to participate in a lie). If you don't get that distinction you really are an idiot. And in your godless world what is your justification for human equality?