Originally posted by Sam
View Post
Announcement
Collapse
Civics 101 Guidelines
Want to argue about politics? Healthcare reform? Taxes? Governments? You've come to the right place!
Try to keep it civil though. The rules still apply here.
Try to keep it civil though. The rules still apply here.
See more
See less
Take This Impeachment And Shove It...
Collapse
X
-
-
Originally posted by Cow Poke View PostNo, Sam ---- lemme type really slowly....
There was an ACTUAL UNDENIABLE CRIME that led to the impeachment process for Nixon. Nobody had to go to focus groups to figure out what to call it.
There was NOT an ACTUAL UNDENIABLE CRIME that led to the impeachment process for Trump. The Democrats began talking about impeachment BEFORE Trump even allegedly committed the "crime".
You're trying to argue that the public was able to tie Nixon to an "ACTUAL UNDENIABLE CRIME" but the point is that Republicans were not doing that until very late in the impeachment process.
So here, with any luck.
--Sam
Leave a comment:
-
Originally posted by Sam View PostWhat seems obvious is that saying "There was an actual CRIME with Nixon" when the point is that Nixon's culpability in the criminal behavior leads to a non sequitur. We've gone over the federal crimes that Trump exposed himself and others to regarding Ukraine but the point of comparison are the articles of impeachment and support for removal on the basis of Nixon's and Trump's actions.
If you're just saying "There was a burglary maybe possibly tied to Nixon" as something different, it's not a sensible difference.
--Sam
There was an ACTUAL UNDENIABLE CRIME that led to the impeachment process for Nixon. Nobody had to go to focus groups to figure out what to call it.
There was NOT an ACTUAL UNDENIABLE CRIME that led to the impeachment process for Trump. The Democrats began talking about impeachment BEFORE Trump even allegedly committed the "crime".
Leave a comment:
-
What seems obvious is that saying "There was an actual CRIME with Nixon" when the point is that Nixon's culpability in the criminal behavior leads to a non sequitur. We've gone over the federal crimes that Trump exposed himself and others to regarding Ukraine but the point of comparison are the articles of impeachment and support for removal on the basis of Nixon's and Trump's actions.
If you're just saying "There was a burglary maybe possibly tied to Nixon" as something different, it's not a sensible difference.
--Sam
Leave a comment:
-
Originally posted by Sam View PostSo, no. The criminality of Nixon was not immediately recognized by Republican politicians or voters. And even at the height of support for Nixon's removal, almost 40% polled did not think Nixon should be removed from office. If, as you claim, Nixon's criminality was "not disputed" then that's a pretty damning indictment of that 40%!
--Sam
Nobody was disputing that THAT ACTUAL CRIME happened. Unlike Trump's impeachment, where it was an impeachment in SEARCH of a crime.
Leave a comment:
Related Threads
Collapse
Topics | Statistics | Last Post | ||
---|---|---|---|---|
Started by Mountain Man, Today, 06:07 PM
|
11 responses
51 views
1 like
|
Last Post
by Sam
Today, 09:41 PM
|
||
Started by seer, Today, 09:26 AM
|
6 responses
34 views
0 likes
|
Last Post
by rogue06
Today, 11:28 AM
|
||
Started by seer, Today, 07:47 AM
|
8 responses
56 views
0 likes
|
Last Post
by seer
Today, 09:58 AM
|
||
Started by Cow Poke, Yesterday, 02:53 PM
|
25 responses
146 views
0 likes
|
Last Post
by Sparko
Today, 06:50 AM
|
||
Started by CivilDiscourse, Yesterday, 10:34 AM
|
31 responses
129 views
0 likes
|
Last Post Today, 07:36 AM |
Leave a comment: