Announcement

Collapse

Civics 101 Guidelines

Want to argue about politics? Healthcare reform? Taxes? Governments? You've come to the right place!

Try to keep it civil though. The rules still apply here.
See more
See less

Take This Impeachment And Shove It...

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • Originally posted by Cow Poke View Post
    She is serving Trump much better as an adversary. Hail Queen Nancy, may she reign forever (though, hopefully, as minority leader)!
    Trump has no limits to his bad behaviour, and his base enjoy his combativeness, and they root for him no matter who he attacks; but this is very far removed from what we ought to expect from someone holding this great office. The USA is in a deep hole and it is still digging. The solution is not in the direction of more Trump.

    Comment


    • Originally posted by dirtfloor View Post
      Trump has no limits to his bad behaviour, and his base enjoy his combativeness, and they root for him no matter who he attacks; but this is very far removed from what we ought to expect from someone holding this great office. The USA is in a deep hole and it is still digging. The solution is not in the direction of more Trump.
      Trump has been very good for the United States. More Trump is even better.
      Some may call me foolish, and some may call me odd
      But I'd rather be a fool in the eyes of man
      Than a fool in the eyes of God


      From "Fools Gold" by Petra

      Comment


      • Originally posted by Cow Poke View Post
        No, it's actually not - it actually has a legal definition that involves lying under oath.



        Trump was not charged with "OOJ".



        N/A



        How does having a legal definition invalidate their relationship?

        Obstruction of congress!

        Are high crimes actual crimes?

        Comment


        • Originally posted by Watermelon View Post
          How does having a legal definition invalidate their relationship?

          Obstruction of congress!

          Are high crimes actual crimes?
          There's no such thing as "obstruction of Congress". It's a charge the Democrats pulled out of the nearest bodily orifice.

          And, yes, per the Constitution, high crimes refers to actual crimes. The two examples given are treason and bribery.
          Some may call me foolish, and some may call me odd
          But I'd rather be a fool in the eyes of man
          Than a fool in the eyes of God


          From "Fools Gold" by Petra

          Comment


          • Originally posted by firstfloor View Post
            Trump has no limits to his bad behaviour,
            So far, he hasn't killed anybody on 5th avenue in broad daylight.

            and his base enjoy his combativeness,
            It's about time somebody stood up to the MSM and their chosen party!

            and they root for him no matter who he attacks;
            I don't.

            but this is very far removed from what we ought to expect from someone holding this great office.
            It may well be what we need, though, for such a time as this.

            The USA is in a deep hole and it is still digging.
            The USA is doing just fine.

            The solution is not in the direction of more Trump.
            I'm afraid Pelosi has made that a problem - she is a Russian agent working for the reelection of Trump.
            The first to state his case seems right until another comes and cross-examines him.

            Comment


            • Originally posted by Watermelon View Post
              How does having a legal definition invalidate their relationship?
              Trump has not committed, nor been charged with, perjury. Not sure where you're going with this.

              Obstruction of congress!
              A - thats a FAR different animal than obstruction of justice
              2 - it wasn't obstruction of congress - it was obstruction of one very partisan faction of One committee of ONE half of Congress, which is ONE THIRD of the branches of government.

              Are high crimes actual crimes?
              The constitution leaves that fairly open, but you'd know it was a "high crime" if it was universally accepted as a crime - like burglary or perjury. Not just something a focus group makes up.
              The first to state his case seems right until another comes and cross-examines him.

              Comment


              • Originally posted by Mountain Man View Post
                There's no such thing as "obstruction of Congress". It's a charge the Democrats pulled out of the nearest bodily orifice.

                And, yes, per the Constitution, high crimes refers to actual crimes. The two examples given are treason and bribery.
                Yes, the actual wording is...

                "The President, Vice President and all civil Officers of the United States, shall be removed from Office on Impeachment for, and Conviction of, Treason, Bribery, or other high Crimes and Misdemeanors."

                ...the phrase "or other" would indicate SIMILAR offenses, not just anything a focus group invents.
                The first to state his case seems right until another comes and cross-examines him.

                Comment


                • And, remember --- this was not the FIRST impeachment sham aimed at Trump.

                  Formal efforts were initiated by representatives Al Green and Brad Sherman, both Democrats, in 2017, the first year of his presidency!
                  The first to state his case seems right until another comes and cross-examines him.

                  Comment


                  • Here's a shot of Nancy giving that "Don't you DARE cheer" glance to her subjects when she announced the passing of Article I...

                    nancy judge judy.jpg

                    She reminds me a lot of Judge Judy scolding a disorderly plaintiff/defendant.
                    The first to state his case seems right until another comes and cross-examines him.

                    Comment


                    • Originally posted by Cow Poke View Post
                      Yes, the actual wording is...

                      "The President, Vice President and all civil Officers of the United States, shall be removed from Office on Impeachment for, and Conviction of, Treason, Bribery, or other high Crimes and Misdemeanors."

                      ...the phrase "or other" would indicate SIMILAR offenses, not just anything a focus group invents.
                      ..... and the last word means what?

                      Comment


                      • Originally posted by Mountain Man View Post
                        In a fair trial the accussed doesn't get to block the testimony of witnesses and other evidence against them.

                        Comment


                        • Originally posted by JimL View Post
                          In a fair trial the accussed doesn't get to block the testimony of witnesses and other evidence against them.
                          The remedy for that is SCOTUS, but the partisan hacks running the impeachment sham couldn't wait for that -- they had to rush headlong off the cliff into disaster.
                          The first to state his case seems right until another comes and cross-examines him.

                          Comment


                          • Originally posted by Mountain Man View Post
                            Hmmm... it looks like the Democrats have more dirty tricks up their sleeves...

                            The problem I see, is that they are arguing that the missing "evidence" is crucial to their case, yet they voted to impeach without this evidence. They are admitting that they didn't have enough evidence to impeach. You can't convict someone on missing evidence or wishful thinking. I think the Senate or SCOTUS can just invalidate the articles of impeachment if that is the case.

                            Comment


                            • Originally posted by firstfloor View Post
                              ..... and the last word means what?
                              Which last word? Misdemeanors?

                              In lower courts, they are crimes less serious than felonies, punishable by local courts, but crimes nonetheless. In government, they are considered more serious with regards to POTUS, because they would have been committed at a federal level by a federal employee.

                              n. a lesser crime punishable by a fine and/or county jail time for up to one year. Misdemeanors are distinguished from felonies which can be punished by a state prison term. They are tried in the lowest local court such as municipal, police or justice courts. Typical misdemeanors include: petty theft, disturbing the peace, simple assault and battery, drunk driving without injury to others, drunkenness in public, various traffic violations, public nuisances, and some crimes which can be charged either as a felony or misdemeanor depending on the circumstances and the discretion of the District Attorney. "High crimes and misdemeanors" referred to in the U. S. Constitution are felonies."

                              source
                              The first to state his case seems right until another comes and cross-examines him.

                              Comment


                              • Is it OOJ when the investigation itself is rigged? How is fighting against an injust investigation an obstruction of justice. It would be more of an obstruction of injustice.

                                hanghim.jpg

                                Also, can you please cite the law it says that the President is not allowed to seek a ruling by the Supreme Court, you know the actual JUSTICE branch of the US Government?
                                Last edited by Sparko; 12-19-2019, 09:22 AM.

                                Comment

                                Related Threads

                                Collapse

                                Topics Statistics Last Post
                                Started by seer, Today, 11:06 AM
                                3 responses
                                84 views
                                0 likes
                                Last Post Sam
                                by Sam
                                 
                                Started by carpedm9587, Today, 07:03 AM
                                16 responses
                                86 views
                                0 likes
                                Last Post Mountain Man  
                                Started by rogue06, Yesterday, 09:51 AM
                                0 responses
                                20 views
                                0 likes
                                Last Post rogue06
                                by rogue06
                                 
                                Started by seer, 05-16-2024, 05:00 PM
                                0 responses
                                32 views
                                0 likes
                                Last Post seer
                                by seer
                                 
                                Started by seer, 05-16-2024, 11:43 AM
                                207 responses
                                819 views
                                0 likes
                                Last Post carpedm9587  
                                Working...
                                X