Trump not concerned with Russian interference in U.S election!

[JimL]

JimL,
I presume then that you are strongly against the socialist-communist movement of the majority Democrat party.

I state this with recognition of what you posted to CP

It would be ironic for you to question CP's so-called susceptibility if you suffer from the same.

Well, you my friend are obviously susceptible to the lies since there is no socialist-communist movement of the majority democratic party. Stop watching Sean Hannity, the virus is taking hold.

[Cow Poke]

No, I'm not susceptible to lies like you Trumpsters so obviously are, CP.

The very fact that you keep repeating this moronic lie shows what a propaganda slave you are, Jim. And a dishonest one, at that. You not only swallow lies, you repeat them.

[Mountain Man]

You'd think you'd be able to figure out from my post that they, the respective campaigns, did know, since Obama brought it to the attention of Congress.

Certainly the Trump campaign was never told. Instead, Obama and his gang of crooks launched into an investigation/frame-up. It was the entire basis for Mueller's witch hunt, remember?

[Mountain Man]

Hey, Jimmy, can you give me an example of naivety?

...there is no socialist-communist movement of the majority democratic party.

Thanks, Jimmy!

[rogue06]

Certainly the Trump campaign was never told. Instead, Obama and his gang of crooks launched into an investigation/frame-up. It was the entire basis for Mueller's witch hunt, remember?

Why wasn't Trump informed about possible infiltration in the same way that the FBI informed Dianne Feinstein (D-Calif. -- then chairwoman of the Senate Intelligence Committee) of the Chinese spy in her midsts who was an office staffer, her chauffeur and liaison to the Asian-American community for, IIRC, something like 20 years? In one case, the FBI briefed Feinstein, but in the other, they proceeded to use informants and surveillance warrants to spy on the Trump campaign. And let's not forget, in the former there was an actual spy whereas in the latter there was absolutely nothing.

As the Wall Street Journal oh so correctly asked

[rogue06]

Well, you my friend are obviously susceptible to the lies since there is no socialist-communist movement of the majority democratic party.

They are the tail that is wagging the dog.

[demi-conservative]

Are you scandinavian?

Maybe it's time to speak like a Finn.

The real world with respect to democracy and freedom must be principled

[firstfloor]

Will Christians support blatant lawlessness? By appearances, so far, the answer is yes.

[Cow Poke]

Will Christians support blatant lawlessness? By appearances, so far, the answer is yes.

You need to cut back on the catnip, my friend.

[Charles]

Will Christians support blatant lawlessness? By appearances, so far, the answer is yes.

Some of them were ok with children in cages, family separations and the constant lies, so it would not surprise me if that was the case.

[Cow Poke]

Some of them were ok with children in cages, family separations and the constant lies, so it would not surprise me if that was the case.

Which of us were "ok" with children in cages, Charles?

And do you honestly believe that Christians "support blatant lawlessness". Do you have anything at all to back up that nonsense?

[firstfloor]

You need to cut back on the catnip, my friend.

The Christian Right could put an end to Trumpism. They show no sign of discomfort so far. Therefore, Trumpism redefines the Religious Right.

Some make a very weird excuse for their hypocrisy; that God sends imperfect people to do His bidding. But anything you win is tarnished and ill gotten. That costs the respect and support of others.

[Charles]

Which of us were "ok" with children in cages, Charles?

And do you honestly believe that Christians "support blatant lawlessness". Do you have anything at all to back up that nonsense?

Way too many. Some took a more "subtile" aproach with whataboutism, relativism or just tried to put focus elsewhere. You were in the last category. Many different attempts to cover up like you are seemingly doing right now.

I never made the claim you ask me to backup. I only said I would not be surprised to see it. The support for that statement was actually in the post in case you missed it.

[Cow Poke]

Way too many. Some took a more "subtile" aproach with whataboutism, relativism or just tried to put focus elsewhere. You were in the last category. Many different attempts to cover up like you are seemingly doing right now.

I never made the claim you ask me to backup. I only said I would not be surprised to see it. The support for that statement was actually in the post in case you missed it.

Ah, you mean firstfloor's totally unsubstantiated kitty litter.

[Cow Poke]

The Christian Right could put an end to Trumpism. They show no sign of discomfort so far. Therefore, Trumpism redefines the Religious Right.

Perhaps back off the catnip altogether for a bit.

Some make a very weird excuse for their hypocrisy; that God sends imperfect people to do His bidding. But anything you win is tarnished and ill gotten. That costs the respect and support of others.

Well, I suppose we COULD have voted for Hillary and her culture of death, giving SCOTUS to her to accomplish her evil plan...