Banning Chick-fil-A is not only bigoted -- it�s illegal

[Sparko]

Do you say the same thing about Incest? Pedophiles?

"Just because you don't want to marry your daughter doesn't mean that no one else can marry their daughter"

[Zymologist]

Do you say the same thing about Incest? Pedophiles?

"Just because you don't want to marry your daughter doesn't mean that no on else can marry their daughter"

Let's not be regressive, now.

[rogue06]

I can't believe CP hasn't commented a single word about this egregious grammatical error yet.

I'm so proud of him.

I try to use a grammatically incorrect their/there/they're or your/you're every day but he refuses to take the bait

[JonathanL]

I try to use a grammatically incorrect their/there/they're or your/you're every day but he refuses to take the bait

Well, their is the problem then. You've desensitized him to it.

[Sparko]

Well, their is the problem then. You've desensitized him to it.

CP is colorblind two grammaticational errers.

[firstfloor]

Do you say the same thing about Incest? Pedophiles?

"Just because you don't want to marry your daughter doesn't mean that no one else can marry their daughter"

[Cow Poke]

I can't believe CP hasn't commented a single word about this egregious grammatical error yet.

I'm so proud of him.

I'm trying to be brave and tolerant.

[Cow Poke]

Just because you do not want to marry a gay does not mean that no one else can have a gay marriage.

My wife would really frown on me marrying a gay.

Why are you such an intolerant judgmental bigot?

[firstfloor]

My wife would really frown on me marrying a gay.



Why are you such an intolerant judgmental bigot?

Not infrequently I fail to explain myself adequately. On the whole, I think it is best that people are allowed to live the way that they wish to live and society should avoid being judgmental while no harm is done to other people.

[Cow Poke]

Not infrequently I fail to explain myself adequately.

We agree.

On the whole, I think it is best that people are allowed to live the way that they wish to live and society should avoid being judgmental while no harm is done to other people.

So, you would agree that Chick-Fil-A should be allowed to sell Chicken Sandwiches in the San Antonio airport, as was originally agreed? EGGcellent!!!!

[firstfloor]

We agree.



So, you would agree that Chick-Fil-A should be allowed to sell Chicken Sandwiches in the San Antonio airport, as was originally agreed? EGGcellent!!!!

Unfortunately, the chicken sandwiches got political.

[Cow Poke]

Unfortunately, the chicken sandwiches got political.

No, they didn't at all. The owner of the company exercised his first amendment right to .....

Wait... is this like transubstantiation? You think that the chicken sandwiches and Cokes actually become the body and blood of the owners?


No, FF --- the pinko commie liberal anti-Christian bigots at San Antonio City Hall are trying to make the Chicken Sandwiches political.

[tabibito]

Not infrequently I fail to explain myself adequately. On the whole, I think it is best that people are allowed to live the way that they wish to live and society should avoid being judgmental while no harm is done to other people.

That works well enough .... until people decide that not lauding them is inflicting harm.

[firstfloor]

No, they didn't at all. The owner of the company exercised his first amendment right to .....

Wait... is this like transubstantiation? You think that the chicken sandwiches and Cokes actually become the body and blood of the owners?


No, FF --- the pinko commie liberal anti-Christian bigots at San Antonio City Hall are trying to make the Chicken Sandwiches political.

They take the profits from chicken sandwiches and use them against gays. There are consequences because people hate the taste of politics in their food.

[tabibito]

They take the profits from chicken sandwiches and use them against gays. There are consequences because people hate the taste of politics in their food.

Ah - so it is OK to punish people for having points of view that you don't agree with. Or is it that you consider their actions against gays somehow less moral than gay supporters taking action against them?