I'm not really sure what his complaints are based on. I mean, I don't exactly disagree with him on a number of things, but he doesn't seem to offer up evidence that what he's complaining about are actually hurting the election chances for Democrats, given that they seem extremely likely to win the House of Representatives. The Senate's unlikely, but the map is so bad for them this election that that doesn't mean much.
The argument could be made that the Democrats would win the House more decisively if they were to do what he suggests (and the House swapping parties isn't necessarily a reflection of the Democrats doing well so much as it's the fact the President's party almost always loses seats in the House during midterms), but his article doesn't actually do anything to give a basis for the idea these things aren't working in terms of getting voters out.
The "up-and-coming younger generation of voters" has always been the most liberal segment of the population, though, and become more conservative as they age. The members of the hippie generation are now reliable conservative voters.
The argument could be made that the Democrats would win the House more decisively if they were to do what he suggests (and the House swapping parties isn't necessarily a reflection of the Democrats doing well so much as it's the fact the President's party almost always loses seats in the House during midterms), but his article doesn't actually do anything to give a basis for the idea these things aren't working in terms of getting voters out.
Originally posted by Starlight
View Post
Comment