Trump Tweets

[demi-conservative]

[demi-conservative]

then

[Mountain Man]

Then there's this gem from Feb. 2014!

Screen Shot 2017-12-29 at 11.22.49 AM.jpg
https://twitter.com/realDonaldTrump/...74043354611712

[Darth Executor]

vanityfairtrump.jpg

https://twitter.com/realDonaldTrump/...01576381505536

[Tassman]

Then there's this gem from Feb. 2014!

[ATTACH=CONFIG]25713[/ATTACH]
https://twitter.com/realDonaldTrump/...74043354611712

Scientific evidence for warming of the climate system is unequivocal.

https://climate.nasa.gov/evidence/

Ignoramuses like Trump, who deny it for personal financial gain or Evangelicals who are hoping for Armageddon are putting the planet and the rest of us at risk.

[demi-conservative]

[Sparko]

I am just glad there is a "C" in there after the "F" in KFC and not in between the U and the K.

[Mountain Man]

Scientific evidence for warming of the climate system is unequivocal.

https://climate.nasa.gov/evidence/

NASA has deliberately corrupted the historical temperature record, and they've been doing it for years. They are not a reliable source.

Source: American Thinker

The NASA/GISS temperature record is not actually a record of recorded temperatures. It is simply the most recent version of NASA's adjustments to older adjustments. It is not thermometer readings. It is models all the way down.

In 2012, I wrote an American Thinker article on the status of global warming at the time. I used the latest available NASA/GISS data to do that analysis, which was the version NASA had on its website on April 30, 2012 (Land-Ocean Temperature Index [LOTI]).

At that time, the data from 1880 through 2011 showed a warming trend of 0.59 degrees Celsius per century.

What is that warming trend using the latest data from NASA's website (December 30, 2017), using those same exact years (1880-2011)? The answer is 0.66˚ C.

How did warming accelerate if we are looking at the very same years?

Apparently, the Earth is getting warmer faster than it was five and a half years ago, but not because of actual recorded thermometer readings in those last five and a half years. It is getting warmer faster because NASA adjusted the data to show faster warming.

When you go to the NASA website, you can download temperature anomalies "1880-present." But those data change every month. NASA adjusts it. You cannot find any older versions. NASA makes available only its most recent version. And NASA does not explain how it adjusts the data. You must simply trust it.

I still have the data from 2012 only because I downloaded them to a spreadsheet and kept that spreadsheet.

[...]

And I have no idea how much adjusting NASA did before April 2012. For all I know, the entire "warming trend" is simply one big "adjustment trend."

I wrote of NASA's "rubber ruler" in 2012. NASA changes the temperature "record," going back to 1880, every month. In just one month in 2012, August to September, 60% of NASA's temperature record changed. How did temperature readings in August of 2012 cause 60% of the temperatures from 1880 to 2011 to change? Anthony Watts says NASA is violating the Data Quality Act.

How does one validate a climate model using temperature observations, if those "observations" were themselves adjusted using models? Real science means using the scientific method, which means using physical measurements to test a hypothesis.

The simple explanation is that NASA is reversing that method. It apparently uses the global warming hypothesis to adjust physical measurements. That is not science. It is the opposite of science.

http://www.americanthinker.com/artic...an_update.html

© Copyright Original Source

And it's not just NASA:

Source: Breitbart

http://www.breitbart.com/big-governm...d-study-finds/

© Copyright Original Source

From the study itself:

[demi-conservative]

Media genius!!!

(on my first try)

Anonymous sources say Hillary crying due to burns of third degree, vodka everywhere!!!

[whag]

Media genius!!!

060530C2-51D7-4B46-8EBB-9FADF7FFEEBF.jpeg

[Darth Executor]

[ATTACH=CONFIG]25829[/ATTACH]

if trump is so dumb how did he beat and humiliate you so badly?

[Tassman]

NASA has deliberately corrupted the historical temperature record, and they've been doing it for years. They are not a reliable source.

Source: American Thinker

The NASA/GISS temperature record is not actually a record of recorded temperatures. It is simply the most recent version of NASA's adjustments to older adjustments. It is not thermometer readings. It is models all the way down.

In 2012, I wrote an American Thinker article on the status of global warming at the time. I used the latest available NASA/GISS data to do that analysis, which was the version NASA had on its website on April 30, 2012 (Land-Ocean Temperature Index [LOTI]).

At that time, the data from 1880 through 2011 showed a warming trend of 0.59 degrees Celsius per century.

What is that warming trend using the latest data from NASA's website (December 30, 2017), using those same exact years (1880-2011)? The answer is 0.66˚ C.

How did warming accelerate if we are looking at the very same years?

Apparently, the Earth is getting warmer faster than it was five and a half years ago, but not because of actual recorded thermometer readings in those last five and a half years. It is getting warmer faster because NASA adjusted the data to show faster warming.

When you go to the NASA website, you can download temperature anomalies "1880-present." But those data change every month. NASA adjusts it. You cannot find any older versions. NASA makes available only its most recent version. And NASA does not explain how it adjusts the data. You must simply trust it.

I still have the data from 2012 only because I downloaded them to a spreadsheet and kept that spreadsheet.

[...]

And I have no idea how much adjusting NASA did before April 2012. For all I know, the entire "warming trend" is simply one big "adjustment trend."

I wrote of NASA's "rubber ruler" in 2012. NASA changes the temperature "record," going back to 1880, every month. In just one month in 2012, August to September, 60% of NASA's temperature record changed. How did temperature readings in August of 2012 cause 60% of the temperatures from 1880 to 2011 to change? Anthony Watts says NASA is violating the Data Quality Act.

How does one validate a climate model using temperature observations, if those "observations" were themselves adjusted using models? Real science means using the scientific method, which means using physical measurements to test a hypothesis.

The simple explanation is that NASA is reversing that method. It apparently uses the global warming hypothesis to adjust physical measurements. That is not science. It is the opposite of science.

http://www.americanthinker.com/artic...an_update.html

© Copyright Original Source

And it's not just NASA:

Source: Breitbart

http://www.breitbart.com/big-governm...d-study-finds/

© Copyright Original Source

From the study itself:

https://www.skepticalscience.com/glo...termediate.htm

[Starlight]

[ATTACH=CONFIG]25829[/ATTACH]

TrumpSmart2.jpg

[Tassman]

[ATTACH=CONFIG]25831[/ATTACH]

LOL.

So good, so true!

[whag]

if trump is so dumb how did he beat and humiliate you so badly?