Announcement

Collapse

Civics 101 Guidelines

Want to argue about politics? Healthcare reform? Taxes? Governments? You've come to the right place!

Try to keep it civil though. The rules still apply here.
See more
See less

Assessment of Mr. Trump

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • Originally posted by Starlight View Post
    With reference to Trump, which of those views do you generally opt for? I would say both are manifestly and regularly true of him.
    I'm not a Trump supporter. I was an "anybody but Hillary" voter. I'll leave the defense of Trump to others - I'm just glad Hillary is not POTUS.
    The first to state his case seems right until another comes and cross-examines him.

    Comment


    • Originally posted by Dimbulb View Post
      With reference to Trump, which of those views do you generally opt for? I would say both are manifestly and regularly true of him.
      Yeah, but you have a reputation for saying stupid things, so...
      Some may call me foolish, and some may call me odd
      But I'd rather be a fool in the eyes of man
      Than a fool in the eyes of God


      From "Fools Gold" by Petra

      Comment


      • Originally posted by Cow Poke View Post
        Either he lied, or he's too incompetent to be POTUS. They can't have it both ways.
        Or possibly he's just human. He didn't make a habit of lying like the pathological liar that you support and defend.

        Comment


        • Originally posted by Starlight View Post
          With reference to Trump, which of those views do you generally opt for? I would say both are manifestly and regularly true of him.
          Absolutely! We can always count on Trump to celebrate his own mediocrity and lie about it.

          Comment


          • Originally posted by JimL View Post
            Or possibly he's just human. He didn't make a habit of lying like the pathological liar that you support and defend.
            Jim, you defended NAMBLA far more vigorously than I ever 'defended' Trump.
            The first to state his case seems right until another comes and cross-examines him.

            Comment


            • Originally posted by Cow Poke View Post
              Jim, you defended NAMBLA far more vigorously than I ever 'defended' Trump.
              Regardless, you still support and defend Trump. Why are you so embarrassed to admit it?

              Comment


              • Originally posted by Cow Poke View Post
                Jim, you defended NAMBLA far more vigorously than I ever 'defended' Trump.
                Originally posted by JimL View Post
                Regardless, you still support and defend Trump. Why are you so embarrassed to admit it?
                Your wacko determination to label people as Trump supporters has you so blind you don't realize you just admitted to being a defender of NAMBLA?
                The first to state his case seems right until another comes and cross-examines him.

                Comment


                • Originally posted by Cow Poke View Post
                  Your wacko determination to label people as Trump supporters has you so blind you don't realize you just admitted to being a defender of NAMBLA?
                  No, the one thing has nothing to do with the other, you're just dodging again because of your embarrassment at being a Trump supporter.

                  Comment


                  • Originally posted by JimL View Post
                    No, the one thing has nothing to do with the other, you're just dodging again because of your embarrassment at being a Trump supporter.
                    I am not the least bit embarrassed that I voted for Trump to stop Hillary. I've owned that time and time again. I just don't understand this incredibly childish and idiotic incessant need you have to force labels on other people.
                    The first to state his case seems right until another comes and cross-examines him.

                    Comment


                    • Originally posted by Cow Poke View Post
                      I am not the least bit embarrassed that I voted for Trump to stop Hillary. I've owned that time and time again. I just don't understand this incredibly childish and idiotic incessant need you have to force labels on other people.
                      And I don't understand this incredibly childish and idiotic incessant need you have to deny that you support the treasonous autocrat that you voted for. You defend him, you support his policies. Own it!

                      Comment


                      • Originally posted by JimL View Post
                        And I don't understand this incredibly childish and idiotic incessant need you have to deny that you support the treasonous autocrat that you voted for. You defend him, you support his policies. Own it!
                        The first to state his case seems right until another comes and cross-examines him.

                        Comment


                        • Originally posted by Cow Poke View Post
                          I am not the least bit embarrassed that I voted for Trump to stop Hillary. I've owned that time and time again. I just don't understand this incredibly childish and idiotic incessant need you have to force labels on other people.

                          Comment


                          • Yeah, whatever!
                            The first to state his case seems right until another comes and cross-examines him.

                            Comment


                            • Originally posted by Cow Poke View Post
                              Yeah, whatever!
                              Your secret's out, Cow Poke! You're done.
                              I DENOUNCE DONALD J. TRUMP AND ALL HIS IMMORAL ACTS.

                              Comment


                              • Originally posted by Zymologist View Post
                                Your secret's out, Cow Poke! You're done.
                                They only wish. I don't think I've ever seen two people so consumed by what they hate, and defined by what they're against, as JimL and Tassman.
                                The first to state his case seems right until another comes and cross-examines him.

                                Comment

                                Related Threads

                                Collapse

                                Topics Statistics Last Post
                                Started by Cow Poke, Today, 11:24 AM
                                0 responses
                                2 views
                                0 likes
                                Last Post Cow Poke  
                                Started by carpedm9587, Today, 09:13 AM
                                3 responses
                                26 views
                                0 likes
                                Last Post rogue06
                                by rogue06
                                 
                                Started by Cow Poke, Yesterday, 09:15 AM
                                3 responses
                                54 views
                                0 likes
                                Last Post rogue06
                                by rogue06
                                 
                                Started by CivilDiscourse, 06-01-2024, 04:11 PM
                                14 responses
                                99 views
                                0 likes
                                Last Post Sparko
                                by Sparko
                                 
                                Started by seer, 06-01-2024, 03:50 PM
                                2 responses
                                54 views
                                0 likes
                                Last Post seer
                                by seer
                                 
                                Working...
                                X