Roy Moore accused of sexual contact with 14-year old

[Cow Poke]

And, in the hypocrisy department....

This gratuitous comment constitutes a constructive contribution to the discussion in your mind, does it?

Posting a gratuitous comment complaining about a gratuitous comment. Good job, Tassy!

[Cow Poke]

Your subtlety might fool some CP, but it doesn't escape me. I doubt it's fooling many others either.

Except that others probably noticed there was no name calling in that post, Jimmy. Perhaps you got your widdle feewins hurt because I referred to a fictional "liberal talking points for dummies", and assumed that means you are a dummy. If the show fits, and all that...

Here's the post...

Cut him some slack, TL - he's only regurgitating what he reads in his 'liberal talking points for dummies" faxes.

To claim I called you a name there makes you look like a dummy.

[Sparko]

If the show fits, and all that...

[Cow Poke]

That works, too!

[Cow Poke]

I see you're resorting to your childish name calling again, eh CP?

This gratuitous comment constitutes a constructive contribution to the discussion in your mind, does it?

Hey Jimmy, your fellow leftist hippi-crit thinks you need to cut out these gratuitous comments. Just imagine how he'll blow his stack when he discovers you routinely call people morons, idiots, and dumbass!


You guys are a riot.

[JimL]

Hey Jimmy, your fellow leftist hippi-crit thinks you need to cut out these gratuitous comments. Just imagine how he'll blow his stack when he discovers you routinely call people morons, idiots, and dumbass!


You guys are a riot.

I only do so to disrespectful hypocritical bully types like yourself CP who seem to have a need to constantly demean people that disagree with them.

[Cow Poke]

I only do so to disrespectful hypocritical bully types like yourself CP who seem to have a need to constantly demean people that disagree with them.

This gratuitous comment constitutes a constructive contribution to the discussion in your mind, does it?

You are a riot, indeed.

[JimL]

Except that others probably noticed there was no name calling in that post, Jimmy. Perhaps you got your widdle feewins hurt because I referred to a fictional "liberal talking points for dummies", and assumed that means you are a dummy. If the show fits, and all that...

Here's the post...



To claim I called you a name there makes you look like a dummy.

To believe you didn't call me a name there makes you an actual dummy.

[RumTumTugger]

You are a riot, indeed.

He has got to stop using the mirror his mentor gave him and use a Monitor instead. Sheesh, JimL should have gotten a better mentor then Starlight.

[Cow Poke]

To believe you didn't call me a name there makes you an actual dummy.

This gratuitous comment constitutes a constructive contribution to the discussion in your mind, does it?

[John Reece]

Time for another return to the topic of this thread.

Breitbart continues to provide the most incisive commentary and the most thoroughly researched factual information, the latest example of which is presented here.

See also this.

[alaskazimm]

Time for another return to the topic of this thread.

Breitbart continues to provide the most incisive commentary and the most thoroughly researched factual information, the latest example of which is presented here.

See also this.

Quoted from the first source. This is the really the crux of the matter the blatant hypocrisy of the MSM and the left

This legion of sick freaks feigning moral horror over a 30-year-old man legally dating a 16 year-old girl is the height of partisanship.

Never forget that these are the same people who are okay with seven-year-olds choosing and changing their gender; kindergartners losing their innocence by way of lessons about homosexuality; instructions in Teen Vogue about anal sex; and 12-year-old girls being exposed to a penis owned by a mentally ill man in a dress.

Please, you sick freaks, spare me your outrage.

[Terraceth]

"and 12-year-old girls being exposed to a penis owned by a mentally ill man in a dress."

What is this a reference to?

[alaskazimm]

"and 12-year-old girls being exposed to a penis owned by a mentally ill man in a dress."

What is this a reference to?

I'm guessing it's a reference to trannys being able to "self-identify" as the opposite gender and then being able to go into the women's bathroom unimpeded.

[One Bad Pig]

To believe you didn't call me a name there makes you an actual dummy.

Er, Jim? Arguing this point is not one of your better moments. The "X for dummies" publications have been out for a couple decades now.