Harvey Weinstein: Another Good Liberal...

[Sparko]

I wonder if that was the same list that Dimbulb posted several months ago, where they would claim it was a lie simply because they disagreed with him. Funny stuff.

same one. this was it: https://www.nytimes.com/interactive/...s.html?mcubz=3

[One Bad Pig]

(Homework assignment for Jimmy: learn how to use commas; also apostrophes. It should be "it's" and not "its" in this context. )

I've come to the conclusion that Jim simply doesn't care. We're just not worth the effort.

[seer]

https://www.thewrap.com/media-enable...ew-york-times/

[KingsGambit]

I still have no idea who Harvey Weinstein is

[Cow Poke]

I still have no idea who Harvey Weinstein is

Hollywood sleazebag that they all worshiped because he was a kingmaker and a queenmaker, but when exposed as a worse-than-Trump womanizer, they have to pretend to be outraged and run from him like scalded dogs.

[rogue06]

more irony from the guy who just spouts liberal talking points and who supported the ACTUAL proven biggest liar who ever ran for President, Hillary.




I can't talk for Darth but I expected Trump to twist your panties in a bunch and make you squeal. I voted for Trump because I knew he would cause the liberals to go into a tail spin and foam at the mouth. None of you have disappointed in the least.

I didn't vote for Trump. I voted against Hillary. Although I must admit that I have taken some enjoyment watching some of those on the left sink deeply into Trump Derangement Syndrome as they stay constantly enraged and spin about on their eyebrows spitting wooden nickles.

[rogue06]

Hollywood sleazebag that they all worshiped because he was a kingmaker and a queenmaker, but when exposed as a worse-than-Trump womanizer, they have to pretend to be outraged and run from him like scalded dogs.

Interesting in that it seems (according to a news report on my radio when I drove to work this morning) that the New York Times

[rogue06]

no he doesn't. I remember the list Tassy posted. It was hilarious at the transparent attempts to split hairs and nitpick some way to say Trump lied. Hilarious. stuff like he said "all" when it was just "most"

In contrast we have Hillary on record lying outright and contradicting herself.

Go back and read my posts before the election. I was never a Trump fan. It was Nope and Noper for me.

[ATTACH=CONFIG]24372[/ATTACH]

However when it came down to having to make a choice I had to go with Nope rather than Noper. I wanted Kasich. But once Trump was elected, I was pleasantly surprised that he actually has tried to keep his promises, despite the entire congress fighting him. But I still don't like him as a person. I think he is too juvenile in his trolling of the press and the liberals in twitter and so on. I think he needs to act more presidential. But I do love how he has made you and the other liberals foam at the mouth and twitch. After 8 years of Obama, it's the least you deserve.

"Nope and Noper"

That succinctly covers it for me.

[rogue06]

Hollywood sleazebag that they all worshiped because he was a kingmaker and a queenmaker, but when exposed as a worse-than-Trump womanizer, they have to pretend to be outraged and run from him like scalded dogs.

Apparently he has been thanked by Oscar winners far more than anyone else including God.

[Cow Poke]

Apparently he has been thanked by Oscar winners far more than anyone else including God.

Oh yeah, then the .... "well, GOSH, I didn't know ANY of that, and if I did, I would NEVER have......"

like rats running from a sinking ship

[Mountain Man]

"Not everybody knew" would imply that people did know.

[rogue06]

Oh yeah, then the .... "well, GOSH, I didn't know ANY of that, and if I did, I would NEVER have......"

like rats running from a sinking ship

Apparently the Democratic National Committee (DNC) has taken some heat (even from some liberals) calling for them (and the many Democrat politicians) to return some of his constant influx of donations to their campaigns. They responded by donating money to liberal causes which coincidentally often happen to contribute money to them. Almost like money laundering.

[rogue06]

"Not everybody knew" would imply that people did know.

Exactly. Just not "everybody."

[Cow Poke]

"Not everybody knew" would imply that people did know.

They can't escape the fact that some (many) people knew -- it's their cowardly way of saying "not ME" without actually saying it, because it may subsequently be proven that the DID know.

[seer]

As Democrats denounce Weinstein, Clintons and Obama stay mum

http://www.cnn.com/2017/10/09/politi...ein/index.html