Originally posted by Cow Poke
View Post
In his defense, all Christian nationalists are "Cafeteria Christians" in that they all selectively twist Scripture to their politics. Sam prefers Leviticus 25 over Leviticus 20 while he derides those who prefer 20 over 25 Of course Sam also wants the veneer of opposing endorsement of Christianity by the State when he openly justifies public policy with Scripture. The consistent approach would be to support both chapters.
I wonder though if Sam believes farmers should not sow every 7th year.
My apologies to Sam for previously referring to chapter 19.
Comment