Announcement

Collapse

Civics 101 Guidelines

Want to argue about politics? Healthcare reform? Taxes? Governments? You've come to the right place!

Try to keep it civil though. The rules still apply here.
See more
See less

Anatomy of a Stolen Election

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • Anatomy of a Stolen Election

    Donald J. Trump (the demented geriatric, known rapist, and convicted felon), is plotting to steel the 2024 election, with the help of Roger Stone.

    You may find that that name, Roger Stone, sounds familiar. He was a political spy for Richard Nixon. He helped organize the Brooks Brothers Riot, an attempt to interfere with the 2000 Florida recount. In 2019, he was convicted of witness tampering, obstructing an official proceeding, and lying to Congress. However, he was pardoned before serving any time by Donald Trump (if you recall, that's the demented geriatric, known rapist, and also a convicted felon). (I'm referencing Wikipedia for toilet reading: Roger Stone)

    So far so good?

    Roger Stone was recently recorded during an event at Mar-a-Lago what sounds like a plot the overthrow of the 2024 election. All following quotes are from Roger Stone, however be aware that he is talking to what he thinks are MAGA supporters. He talks in a form of Newspeak which has to be interpreted.

    For instance, he assumes that the 2020 election was stolen. (We know that as a matter of fact, there were a few hundred possible cases of voter fraud in 6 battleground states, affecting less than 0.2% of the count there (AP News, 2021-12-14). Often the fraud was committed by registered Republicans, like this keeper: Another voter fraud accusation blows up in Republicans’ faces CNN, 2021-11-21. I'm going to treat the fidelity of the 2020 election as settled, despite the lies of MAGA goons)

    Donald Trump (the demented geriatric, known rapist, and convicted felon) has made suppositional assertions several times that the only way for Democrats to win is to cheat. (To date no evidence of widespread cheating has been given. Maybe the evidence fell out of Rudi's pocket on his way to the Georgia civil lawsuit (AP News, 2023-12-16). Maybe Fox News can find it before their next multibillion dollar lawsuit (ABC News, 2023-04-20) Roger Stone's statements need to be treated as though he's speaking to someone isn't aware that these lies are … lies.

    Keeping up so far? Alright, here we go.

    The following quotes, unless otherwise noted, are taken from the Rolling Stone article, ‘Lawyers, Judges, Technology’: Roger Stone Touts Plan for Trump Win in Secret Recording posted 2024-06-18

    “At least this time when they do it, you have a lawyer and a judge — his home phone number standing by — so you can stop it,” Stone says at one point. “We made no preparations last time, none … There are technical, legal steps that we have to take to try and have a more honest election. We’re not there yet, but there’s things that can be done.”
    Here, when Stone says we'll "have a more honest election," he means they'll have an election that is rigged in favor of Trump. Remember that no widespread cheating has happened, only a lot of supposition. In the 2020 election, pro-Trump lawsuits were dropped left and right due to lack of evidence. However, this time they will have a Trump-appointed judge handy who will throw out the results in some voting precinct or district. Having a judge in your pocket would be worthless in a precinct that's overwhelmingly for Trump. So, for this to be of value it must be a judge that covers a battleground or Democrat precinct. Aileen Cannon would be an example, but there may be others. Whoever it is, they are must be bought off, or at least partial to MAGA in a way that is disgraceful for a judge.

    When Sammarco asks Stone what would stop Trump’s opponents from committing “voter fraud” like “ballot harvesting,” Stone replies that “in some states, it’ll be easier to stop. In other places, it won’t.”
    For reference, "ballot harvesting" is the act of delivering completed absentee ballots on behalf of other people (What Is Ballot Harvesting?, 2024-04-22). Suppose you collect an absentee ballot from your elderly parent, or your spouse who's running late for work. You take it and deliver it to a polling station, you are a ballot harvester. It's not clear that anything is wrong with doing this. It's only illegal in Alabama, and many states have provisions on how to properly do it.

    “We should be suing in half a dozen places,” Stone adds. “I mean we’re finally now on an offensive footing.” Stone goes on to tell Sammarco that — now that the Republican National Committee is under MAGA control — they can spend “lots more” money on election monitoring. He also points to “changes in state law, real-time voter list monitoring, going to court as we just did to challenge some of the vote laws,” and that “we went into court to sue in Michigan over the hand [written] ballots.”
    To be clear, Stone is saying that funds are diverted away from typical campaigning, by Lara Trump and other MAGAtwerps at the RNC, towards litigation. They are actually preparing to attack free and fair elections before they even occur. This premeditation makes the GOP no longer a political party; it's a litigious corporation more hostile to their enemies than Disney.

    I'm glad that he mentioned changes in State laws. In 2021 there were 33 State laws that make voting harder (Voting Laws Roundup: October 2021, 2021-10-04), while in 2023 there were 17 (Voting Laws Roundup: October 2023 2023-10-19). Now, there were many more laws that made voting easier, and many of the restrictive laws involved ID requirements. (Some commentators complain that requiring photo IDs is a sort of poll tax and is unconstitutional. I think the impact to the election is going to be so tiny that it can be considered trivial for now.) I'll highlight some laws that should be conspicuously disturbing:
    • In Georgia, it's illegal to hand out water bottles to voters waiting in line. I hope there's no heat wave this November
    • In Texas, there will be fewer polling stations, so voters in mostly urban (i.e. Democrat) districts will have longer wait times
    • In North Carolina, it is more likely for election boards to be deadlocked, preventing individual county elections (or even the State election) from being certified. No doubt we'll see deadlocks in more Democrat counties than Republican ones.
    In a separate conversation with Windsor […] Stone affirms his belief that the election “can be stolen again,” going on to describe the various criminal cases against Trump as a way to “suck up his money, suck up his time, and create the reason why their theft is plausible, believable.”
    All well and good, except that Trump actually committed crimes. Anyone who follows the cases, not just through the Fox News/Newsmax filter, would understand that. Especially now that Trump was convicted.

    “We’re working on this,” Stone assures Windsor, telling her that he worries about “overconfidence” amongst Trump’s supporters depressing voter turnout. He adds that the former president’s allies are prepared with “lawyers, judges, [and] technology,” to challenge election results if needed.
    So we are now talking about allegedly judges, plural, corrupted and on standby to interfere with free and fair elections.

    I'm curious now, what technology might Stone be referring to? Nothing specific is discussed, and the options are limitless. Russian Troll farms? Deep fakes, cheap fakes, shallow fakes? AI bots? Social media outlets are already polluted with extremist materials; you can practically click on anything on Twitter/X and start getting right-wing extremist recommendations from the platform's algorithms. Republicans have directly gone on the attack against researchers who study the propagation of disinformation (New York Times, 2023-06-19).

    Last year, a video obtained by MSNBC showed Stone explaining plans to undermine the Electoral College days before President Joe Biden was declared the winner of the 2020 election, as several states continued to count votes. “Any legislative body may decide on the basis of overwhelming evidence of fraud to send electors to the electoral college who accurately reflect the president’s legitimate victory in their state, which was illegally denied him through fraud,” Stone said.
    Stone is likely referring to the Independent State Legislator doctrine (ISL). Now, this is the right time to don our tin foil hats, because we are going to get into some conspiracy theory territory. ISL is a radical theory that, based on the text of the Constitution, state legislators are not bound by the courts or the State constitutions to manage how elections are conducted. "If you give the legislature a blank check on the manner of appointing presidential electors, then a Republican majority could—in the most muscular version of ISL—simply disregard a Biden victory in the state’s popular vote and appoint Trump electors instead." (The Atlantic, 2022-07-29) This definitely is crazy at first glance, but don’t forget, MAGA already tried something like this before, by sending fake electors from contentious states, in an attempt to replace legitimate electors. They even sent a violent mob to lynch Mike Pence before he could certify the Election results (Snopes, 2021-01-29; see also ‘Everything we trained for’: How the far-right Oath Keepers militia planned for violence on Jan. 6, Politifact 2021-09-23). What they lacked was the political will of those State legislators, and a Supreme Court precedent. Regarding latter, the Supreme Court reaffirmed as recently as 2019 that ISL is bogus. However, 3 SCOTUS justices have hinted that were the issue to go before the Court again, they would side with ISL. That leaves the State Legislators, which merely need to be controlled by a Republican majority, and for them to be corrupted by MAGA. MAGA already controls the GOP nationwide, individual Republican candidates have been told to support Trump or get bent.

    The way this would look, suppose the GOP retains a majority in the Michigan State Legislator, but Biden wins the election there fair and square. Republicans assert that there was widespread voter fraud and the results have to be tossed. There won't be evidence of widespread fraud, of course, they just need to assert the justification of what happens next. The election is tossed out in Michigan, the legislator sends Republican Electors instead. The Electors are kicked back federally. Michigan Republicans sue, and the case makes it all the way to the Supreme Court. The conservative majority in SCOTUS decree that ILS now applies, order the federal government to recognize the Republican Electors. Do this in enough battleground states, and even though Biden really won the Election*, the Presidency goes instead to Donald Trump (the demented geriatric, known rapist, and convicted felon). America ceases to be a democracy, we become a de facto dictatorship like Russia or Hungary.

    *(For the purpose of this hypothetical situation)

    Perhaps it won't go down that way. There are many roadblocks that may foil an Election steal plot, including We the People. However, Donald Trump (the demented geriatric, known rapist, and convicted felon) and his MAGA crony Roger Stone are attempting to undermine a free and fair Election, possibly to destroy Elections once for all. That should scare the living crap out of us.

  • #2
    Cya after the weekend, folks!
    Attached Files

    Comment


    • #3
      Not if we see you first!
      "What has the Church gained if it is popular, but there is no conviction, no repentance, no power?" - A.W. Tozer

      "... there are two parties in Washington, the stupid party and the evil party, who occasionally get together and do something both stupid and evil, and this is called bipartisanship." - Everett Dirksen

      Comment


      • #4
        Ah, great, another TDS post that twists what someone says into the exact opposite because they know what the person "really means"

        Only true blue democrats can read the true intention behind a "dog whistle"


        Comment


        • #5

          Originally posted by Littlejoe View Post
          Not if we see you first!

          The first to state his case seems right until another comes and cross-examines him.

          Comment


          • #6
            Originally posted by Sparko View Post
            Ah, great, another TDS post that twists what someone says into the exact opposite because they know what the person "really means"

            Only true blue democrats can read the true intention behind a "dog whistle"
            I am suspicious of really lengthy OPs or explanations of any simple idea. Gaslighting requires all sorts of contortions to convince the recipient that their eyes are not to be trusted.

            Comment


            • #7
              Originally posted by Sparko View Post
              Ah, great, another TDS post that twists what someone says into the exact opposite because they know what the person "really means"
              Any specifics you'd like to talk about?

              I do. Why would Stone claim to have a Judge available on call? Why would anyone associated with any campaign admit to that?
              Only true blue democrats can read the true intention behind a "dog whistle"
              Meh, The Democratic Party is too "Big Mother" for my taste. (Basically, a little gentler than Orwell's "Big Brother")

              However, I do note your attempt to paint me as partisan, so as to dismiss me more easily. I give you a solid D- for poor form and overall laziness.

              Comment


              • #8
                Originally posted by Ronson View Post
                I am suspicious of really lengthy OPs or explanations of any simple idea.
                I certainly have a habit of being rather verbose, though IMO it's more of a trait of not wanting to be misunderstood the first time. Strawmen are a waste of everyone's time.

                Gaslighting requires all sorts of contortions to convince the recipient that their eyes are not to be trusted.
                2k9q9y.jpg

                Comment


                • #9
                  Originally posted by VonTastrophe View Post

                  Any specifics you'd like to talk about?

                  I do. Why would Stone claim to have a Judge available on call? Why would anyone associated with any campaign admit to that?


                  Meh, The Democratic Party is too "Big Mother" for my taste. (Basically, a little gentler than Orwell's "Big Brother")

                  However, I do note your attempt to paint me as partisan, so as to dismiss me more easily. I give you a solid D- for poor form and overall laziness.
                  I just call em like I see em.

                  Comment


                  • #10
                    Originally posted by VonTastrophe View Post
                    Which word?

                    Comment


                    • #11
                      Having explored the attempts to replace state electoral college voters with fake Republican slates, the pressure put onto the VP to accept the fake voters and the distracting disruption to proceedings on the day, as well as the older attempts to disrupt voting in Democrat-majority areas, I'm morbidly curious as to what the Republicans will try this November to sway the result so that they 'win' and to overturn it if they lose.

                      They're definitely learning from past failures and appear willing to try almost anything.

                      Jorge: Functional Complex Information is INFORMATION that is complex and functional.

                      MM: First of all, the Bible is a fixed document.
                      MM on covid-19: We're talking about an illness with a better than 99.9% rate of survival.

                      seer: I believe that so called 'compassion' [for starving Palestinian kids] maybe a cover for anti Semitism, ...

                      Comment


                      • #12
                        Originally posted by Roy View Post
                        Having explored the attempts to replace state electoral college voters with fake Republican slates, the pressure put onto the VP to accept the fake voters and the distracting disruption to proceedings on the day, as well as the older attempts to disrupt voting in Democrat-majority areas, I'm morbidly curious as to what the Republicans will try this November to sway the result so that they 'win' and to overturn it if they lose.

                        They're definitely learning from past failures and appear willing to try almost anything.
                        2000 Mules?

                        Republicans seem to like to dream up alleged terrible things the Dems could have done, and then themselves get inspired to do it as a result of their belief the Dems are already doing it.
                        "I hate him passionately", he's "a demonic force" - Tucker Carlson, in private, on Donald Trump
                        "Every line of serious work that I have written since 1936 has been written, directly or indirectly, against totalitarianism and for democratic socialism" - George Orwell
                        "[Capitalism] as it exists today is, in my opinion, the real source of evils. I am convinced there is only one way to eliminate these grave evils, namely through the establishment of a socialist economy" - Albert Einstein

                        Comment


                        • #13
                          Originally posted by Starlight View Post
                          2000 Mules?

                          Republicans seem to like to dream up alleged terrible things the Dems could have done, and then themselves get inspired to do it as a result of their belief the Dems are already doing it.
                          Are you sure it's not that Republicans are dreaming up terrible things, doing them, and then falsely accusing the Dems of doing them what they have just done? Cf. Karl Rove.
                          Jorge: Functional Complex Information is INFORMATION that is complex and functional.

                          MM: First of all, the Bible is a fixed document.
                          MM on covid-19: We're talking about an illness with a better than 99.9% rate of survival.

                          seer: I believe that so called 'compassion' [for starving Palestinian kids] maybe a cover for anti Semitism, ...

                          Comment


                          • #14
                            Originally posted by Sparko View Post
                            I just call em like I see em.
                            Umm, okay.

                            Looking at this forum, a lot of users here are evidently suffering from BDS (Biden Derangement Syndrome). Two can play the lazy game.

                            Why would Republicans have judge(s) on-call during election night? To play golf the next day? Judges by definition ought to be impartial.

                            Comment


                            • #15
                              Originally posted by Ronson View Post
                              Which word?
                              Gaslighting, of course. The expression refers to efforts to manipulating another person for the purpose of making them doubt their own senses, memory, or discernment. A good example of gaslighting is when Trump* and his goons convince millions of people the 2020 election was stolen when we can see for ourselves that it was not.

                              *(That is, Donald Trump, the known rapist, convicted felon, who appears to be sundowning in dementia)

                              That's not what I'm doing, of course. We have an adviser to Trump, Roger Stone, how is known to be a bad faith actor in Politics. That was the point of my entire preface. So when I interpret him to be speaking in bad faith, I am not gaslighting. I am just operating under the assumption that Stone is consistent to his own history.

                              Comment

                              Related Threads

                              Collapse

                              Topics Statistics Last Post
                              Started by seer, Today, 09:14 AM
                              9 responses
                              44 views
                              0 likes
                              Last Post seer
                              by seer
                               
                              Started by rogue06, Today, 08:38 AM
                              4 responses
                              24 views
                              0 likes
                              Last Post Sparko
                              by Sparko
                               
                              Started by seer, Yesterday, 01:10 PM
                              16 responses
                              83 views
                              0 likes
                              Last Post seer
                              by seer
                               
                              Started by Roy, Yesterday, 02:39 AM
                              6 responses
                              73 views
                              2 likes
                              Last Post Hypatia_Alexandria  
                              Started by mossrose, 06-25-2024, 10:37 PM
                              61 responses
                              306 views
                              0 likes
                              Last Post seer
                              by seer
                               
                              Working...
                              X