Off With Their Heads...

[rogue06]

Coming from our exchange on my thread, the textual evidence for the posts being made contradicts all the above

You have now successfully used another thread to draw attention to your pusillanimity and dishonesty.

Well done!

Coming from the clown-shoed one who brought up the thread where she runs away from supporting her bizarre claim that special needs means capable and gifted people in Britain.

Your only response has been a desperate attempt to distract and deflect that has repeatedly imploded in your face as every trick you've tried has backfired.

[rogue06]

Hmm, I think you may have had one too
many there my belligerent friend. Post #321 is me replying to Sparko. Maybe you'd better wait until your head clears and give it another try.

This is post #321 for me:

At what point, given such regular pathetic behavior, does it become fair to conclude that the person who keeps offering up such responses can safely be viewed as being rather pathetic themselves?

[Cow Poke]

Neither of us can know the thoughts of those South African men who committed those terrible acts.....

And why were those acts so terrible? Because it is NEVER acceptable to rape infants, regardless of the claim that somebody did so for their own desperate purposes.

[Cow Poke]

Hmm, I think you may have had one too
many there my belligerent friend. Post #321 is me replying to Sparko. Maybe you'd better wait until your head clears and give it another try.

It's an actual screenshot, Jim - and it's comical that a doper suggests my head needs to clear.

321.png

if you have an actual question, ask it. If it's your typical psychotic ranting, I'll may choose to ignore it.

[Cow Poke]

This is post #321 for me:

Yup - same here.

[JimL]

It's an actual screenshot, Jim - and it's comical that a doper suggests my head needs to clear.

321.png

if you have an actual question, ask it. If it's your typical psychotic ranting, I'll may choose to ignore it.

Well on my phone it's post #321 and it's right after rogues post which is #320 and you posted right after my post at #322 so I find it very difficult to believe you didn't see it or couldn't find it. More evasion I'm guessing!!

[Hypatia_Alexandria]

And why were those acts so terrible? Because it is NEVER acceptable to rape infants, regardless of the claim that somebody did so for their own desperate purposes.

I really think you have done this to death. We agreed some pages ago that the act is abhorrent.

[Hypatia_Alexandria]

Coming from the clown-shoed one who brought up the thread where she runs away from supporting her bizarre claim that special needs means capable and gifted people in Britain.

Your only response has been a desperate attempt to distract and deflect that has repeatedly imploded in your face as every trick you've tried has backfired.

By now you have successfully demonstrated that you are devoid of integrity and honesty.

One really does wonder how you fared in your supposed exploits in Latin America. Perhaps like the Duke of Plaza Toro you led your men from behind so that when you had to run away you were in the "fore O".

[seer]

We agreed some pages ago that the act is abhorrent.

But are abhorrent thing always morally wrong?

[JimL]

But are abhorrent thing always morally wrong?

Seer, you guys seem to be missing the point. We virtually all agree, and have asserted as much time and time again that rape, specifically of infants in this case is immoral. But the question is by what logic do you hold to that position? What brings you to conclude what is immoral?

[Cow Poke]

I really think you have done this to death. We agreed some pages ago that the act is abhorrent.

Yes, ma'am - you were dragged kicking and screaming to that conclusion.

[Cow Poke]

Well on my phone it's post #321 and it's right after rogues post which is #320 and you posted right after my post at #322 so I find it very difficult to believe you didn't see it or couldn't find it. More evasion I'm guessing!!

Jim, I really don't care what's on your phone - or that you tend to like to while drawing on your bong.

(And, yes, 321 does, indeed, fall between 320 and 322)

[Hypatia_Alexandria]

Yes, ma'am - you were dragged kicking and screaming to that conclusion.

If that gives you a little thrill of superiority, you go on believing it, despite the fact that I made the following reply to you three days ago on 16th.

I would agree with you because I also consider such an act abhorrent but evidently some individuals, through ignorance and fear, did not.

You seem to have some issues with accepting textual evidence.

[JimL]

Jim, I really don't care what's on your phone - or that you tend to like to while drawing on your bong.

(And, yes, 321 does, indeed, fall between 320 and 322)

Run along there now CP. I wouldn't want you to get a headache by actually honestly and objectively thinking such questions thru for a change. You obviously have no answer so, run along now little boy!!

[Cow Poke]

Run along there now CP.

Try to make me.

I wouldn't want you to get a headache by actually honestly and objectively thinking such questions thru for a change. You obviously have no answer so, run along now!!

So you can smoke your dope in peace?