CNN: More Fake News

[One Bad Pig]

Oh my goodness, you guys are just too funny, i.e. a joke! "If Comey's a liar then you can't trust anything he says?" You have no problem supporting and defending the biggest, most blatant, pathological liar in the world!

No, Sparko has a big problem with supporting Hillary.

[One Bad Pig]

Mostly watching them continue to cling to the belief that Trump colluded with the Russians and is under Investigation even after it all blew up in their faces. And JimL trying to switch to the liberal talking point of "obstruction of justice" that the MSM threw against the wall yesterday, then had to back off of almost instantly, yet JimL still clings to that desperate hope. Both of them are clinging to their unfounded belief despite zero evidence and now even evidence to the contrary. They would make great fundy Christians wouldn't they?

Yep.

[JimL]

which was read to The New York Times by an American official.https://www.nytimes.com/2017/05/19/u...sia-comey.html
When will you learn Jim?

Hey dumbo, connect the dots! The story is not only not refuted by the White House, but supported by Spicer and Trumps own interview with Lester Holt. Ya know, you can't just dismiss everything you don't like as fake news, you just have to use your brain and connect the dots.

[Sparko]

Oh my goodness, you guys are just too funny, i.e. a joke! "If Comey's a liar then you can't trust anything he says?" You have no problem supporting and defending the biggest, most blatant, pathological liar in the world!

Well then, I guess you are just like us! You think Comey is a liar and you believe and support him!



So far the Pathological Liar in Chief has kept his campaign promises (or would if the liberals would let him) - that is more than I can say for the vast majority of politicians.

[Sparko]

Hey dumbo, connect the dots! The story is not only not refuted by the White House, but supported by Spicer and Trumps own interview with Lester Holt. Ya know, you can't just dismiss everything you don't like as fake news, you just have to use your brain and connect the dots.

so now "not refuting" something is evidence that it is true. That is an argument from silence Jimmy. A logical fallacy well-known on these boards. Spicer never even addressed that statement whatsoever.

You never refuted the fact that you are a complete moron like I and others have said many times. That must be evidence that you are one.

[JimL]

But Jim, that was a NYT story, as Sparko linked, based on an anonymous source - again!

Its from the white house transcript seer, if it weren't true the white house would have refuted it, they can't, its documented. And what is he doing bringing Russian spies into the white house for a private meeting with only Russian media aloud in when he knows that they just attacked our elections.

Is this just wishful thinking on your part?

No, I'm just trying to explain the difference between the presidents legal power and its abuse. Just because he can do it legally, doesn't mean it isn't an abuse of power over which he can be impeached.

[JimL]

so now "not refuting" something is evidence that it is true. That is an argument from silence Jimmy. A logical fallacy well-known on these boards. Spicer never even addressed that statement whatsoever.

You never refuted the fact that you are a complete moron like I and others have said many times. That must be evidence that you are one.

Okay Sparko, continue to make a complete fool of yourself, no sweat off my brow.

[One Bad Pig]

No, I'm just trying to explain the difference between the presidents legal power and its abuse. Just because he can do it legally, doesn't mean it isn't an abuse of power over which he can be impeached.

Put your thinking cap on, Jim. Impeachment is only possible for illegal acts. If he can do it legally, it is by definition not an impeachable act.

[seer]

Its from the white house transcript seer, if it weren't true the white house would have refuted it, they can't, its documented. And what is he doing bringing Russian spies into the white house for a private meeting with only Russian media aloud in when he knows that they just attacked our elections.

Where is your evidence that this story was taken from a transcript? Besides it makes no sense Jim - firing Comey would not have stopped or hindered the investigation on any level.

[rogue06]

Put your thinking cap on, Jim. Impeachment is only possible for illegal acts. If he can do it legally, it is by definition not an impeachable act.

His pinhead poked a hole in his thinking cap.

[Darth Executor]

No, I'm just trying to explain the difference between the presidents legal power and its abuse. Just because he can do it legally, doesn't mean it isn't an abuse of power over which he can be impeached.

Just when i thought JimL had reached peak stupid he turns it right around and shows me the sky's the limit.

[seer]

US Constitution:

Article 2, section 4

The President, Vice President and all civil Officers of the United States, shall be removed from Office on Impeachment for, and Conviction of, Treason, Bribery, or other high Crimes and Misdemeanors.

[Zymologist]

US Constitution:

Article 2, section 4

The President, Vice President and all civil Officers of the United States, shall be removed from Office on Impeachment for, and Conviction of, Treason, Bribery, or other high Crimes and Misdemeanors.

Trump's obviously guilty of treason: he colluded with Putin. Duh!

[seer]

Trump's obviously guilty of treason: he colluded with Putin. Duh!

Then that would be an actual crime, Jim was suggesting that Trump could be impeached for things other than crimes.

[Zymologist]

Trump is obviously guilty. Only a rabid, white supremacist Nazi Trump apologist would be demanding evidence at this late juncture.